As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 24, 2019

Registration No. 333-_________

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

________________

FORM S-1

 

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

Flux Power Holdings, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nevada		3690		86-0931332
(State or jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

985 Poinsettia Avenue, Suite A Vista, CA 92081 (877) 505-3589

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

Ronald F. Dutt Chief Executive Officer Flux Power Holdings, Inc. 985 Poinsettia Avenue, Suite A, Vista, CA 92081 (877) 505-3589

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, Including area code, of agent for service)

 

Copies to:

 

John P. Yung, Esq. Daniel B. Eng, Esq. Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP 333 Bush Street, Suite 1100 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 362-2580

John D. Hogoboom, Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 1251 Avenue of Americas New York, NY 10020 (212) 262-6700

________________________

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

 

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. ☒

 

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ☐

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ☐

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☒
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Emerging growth company	☐

  

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act  

 

 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered	Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price(1)	Amount of Registration Fee
Common Stock, $0.001 par value(2) (3)	$15,000,000	$1,818.00
Representatives’ Warrants	$990,000	$119.99
Common Stock, $0.001 par value, issuable upon exercise of the Representatives’ Warrants(3)	--(4)	--(4)
Total	$15,990,000	$1,937.99

 

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED MAY 24, 2019

PROSPECTUS

Shares

Common Stock

 

We are offering shares of common stock in this offering.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB marketplace under the symbol “FLUX.” On May 23, 2019, the closing bid price of our common stock on the OTCQB was $1.00 per share. We have applied to list our common stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “FLUX.” We will not consummate this offering unless our common stock is approved for listing on The NASDAQ Capital Market.

 

The public offering price per share will be determined between us, the underwriters and investors based on market conditions at the time of pricing, and may be at a discount to the current market price of our common stock. Therefore, the recent market price used throughout this prospectus may not be indicative of the actual public offering price.

 

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 7.

 

	Per Share	Total
Public offering price	$	$
Underwriting discount(1)	$	$
Proceeds to us (before expenses)	$	$

 

(1)	See “Underwriting” beginning on page 49 for additional information regarding the compensation payable to the underwriters.

We have granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional shares from us at the public offering price, less the underwriting discount, to cover over-allotments, if any.

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Delivery of the shares of common stock is expected to be made through the facilities of the Depository Trust Company on or about , 2019.

 

___________________________________

Joint Book-Running Managers

 

Roth Capital Partners

Maxim Group LLC

The date of this prospectus is , 2019

 

 

Table of Contents

 

	Page
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY	1
THE OFFERING	6
RISK FACTORS	7
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS	15
USE OF PROCEEDS	16
MARKET INFORMATION	17
CAPITALIZATION	19
DILUTION	20
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	21
BUSINESS	30
MANAGEMENT	40
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	43
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT	45
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	46
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK	47
UNDERWRITING	49
LEGAL MATTERS	54
EXPERTS	54
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION	54
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	F-1

 

Neither we nor the underwriters have authorized anyone to provide you with information other than that contained in this prospectus or any free writing prospectus prepared by or on behalf of us or to which we have referred you. We and the underwriters take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. We and the underwriters are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front cover page of this prospectus, or other earlier date stated in this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of our common stock.

 

No action is being taken in any jurisdiction outside the United States to permit a public offering of our common stock or possession or distribution of this prospectus in that jurisdiction. Persons who come into possession of this prospectus in jurisdictions outside the United States are required to inform themselves about and to observe any restrictions as to this offering and the distribution of this prospectus applicable to that jurisdiction.

 

 

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

 

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere or incorporated by reference in this prospectus. This summary provides an overview of selected information and does not contain all of the information you should consider before investing in our securities. You should read the entire prospectus carefully, especially the “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussions and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to those statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus, before making an investment decision. Unless the context requires otherwise, references to the “Company,” “Flux,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to the combined business of Flux Power Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Flux Power, Inc. (Flux Power), a California corporation.

 

Company Overview

 

We design, develop and sell advanced rechargeable lithium-ion energy storage solutions for lift trucks, airport ground support equipment (GSE) and other industrial motive applications. Our “LiFT” battery packs, including our proprietary battery management system (BMS), provide our customers with a better performing, cheaper and more environmentally friendly alternative, in many instances, to traditional lead-acid and propane-based solutions.

 

We have received Underwriters Laboratory (UL) Listing on our Class 3 Walkie Pallet Jack (Class 3 Walkie) LiFT pack product line in 2016 and expect to seek UL Listing during calendar 2019 for our other product lines, which include Class 1 Counterbalance/Sit down/Ride-on (Class 1 Ride-on) LiFT packs , Class 2 Narrow Aisle LiFT packs, and Class 3 End Rider LiFT packs. We believe that a UL Listing demonstrates the safety, reliability and durability of our products and gives us an important competitive advantage over other lithium-ion energy suppliers. Our Class 3 Walkie LiFT packs have been approved for use by leading industrial motive manufacturers, including Toyota Material Handling USA, Inc., Crown Equipment Corporation, and Raymond Corporation.

 

Within our industrial market segments, we believe that our LiFT pack solutions provide cost and performance benefits over existing lead-acid power products including:

 

 

Additionally, the toxic nature of lead-acid batteries presents significant safety and environmental issues as they are subject to Environmental Protection Agency lead-acid battery reporting requirements, may create an environmental hazard in the event of a cell breach, and emit combustible gases during charging.

 

As a result of the advantages lithium-ion battery technology provide over lead-acid batteries, we have experienced significant growth in our business. We believe we are at the very early stage of a trend toward the adoption of lithium-ion technology and the displacement of lead-acid and propane-based energy storage solutions, which based on North American sales data from the Industrial Truck Association (ITA), we estimate to be a multi-billion dollar per year market.

 

Critical to our success is our innovative and proprietary high power BMS that both optimizes the performance of our LiFT packs and provides a platform for adding new battery pack features, including customized telemetry for customers. The BMS serves as the brain of the battery pack, managing cell balancing, charging, discharging, monitoring and communication between the pack and the forklift.

 

Our engineers design, develop, service, and test our products. We source our battery cells from multiple suppliers in China and the remainder of the components primarily from vendors in the United States. Final assembly, testing and shipping of our products is done from our ISO 9001 certified facility in Vista, California, which includes three assembly lines.

 

 

Our Strengths

 

We have leveraged our experience in lithium-ion technology to design and develop a suite of LiFT pack product lines that we believe provide attractive solutions to customers seeking an alternative to lead-acid and propane-based power products. We believe that the following attributes are significant contributors to our success:

 

Engineering and integration experience in lithium-ion for motive applications: We have been developing lithium-ion applications for the advanced energy storage market since 2010, starting with products for automotive electric vehicle manufacturers. We believe our experience enables us to develop superior solutions.

 

UL Listing: We launched our Class 3 Walkie LiFT pack product line in 2014 and obtained UL Listing for all three different power configurations in January 2016. We believe this UL Listing gives us a significant competitive advantage and provides assurance to customers that our technology has been rigorously tested by an independent third party and determined to be safe, durable and reliable.

 

Original equipment manufacturer (OEM) approvals: Our Class 3 Walkie LiFT packs have been tested and approved for use by Toyota Material Handling USA, Inc., Crown Equipment Corporation, and Raymond Corporation, among the top global lift truck manufacturers by revenue according to Material Handling & Logistics. We also provide a “private label” Class 3 Walkie LiFT pack to a major forklift OEM.

 

Broad product offering and scalable design: We offer LiFT packs for use in a variety of industrial motive applications. We believe that our modular and scalable design enables us to optimize design, inventory, and part count to accommodate natural product extensions of our products to meet customer requirements. Based on our Class 3 Walkie LiFT pack design, we have expanded our product lines to include Class 1 Ride-on, Class 2 Narrow Aisle, and Class 3 End Rider LiFT pack product lines as well as airport GSE packs.

 

Significant advantages over lead acid and propane solutions: We believe that lithium-ion battery systems have significant advantages over existing technologies and will displace lead-acid batteries and propane-based solutions, in most applications. Relative to lead-acid batteries, such advantages include environmental benefits, no water maintenance, faster charge times, greater cycle life and longer run times that provide operational and financial benefits to customers. Compared to propane solutions, lithium-ion systems avoid the generation of exhaust emissions and associated odor and environmental contaminates, and maintenance of an internal combustion engine, which has substantially more parts than an electric motor.

 

Proprietary Battery Management System: We have developed a high power BMS that is incorporated into our entire product family. The BMS serves as the brain of the battery pack, managing cell balancing, charging, discharging, monitoring and communication between the pack and the forklift. Our BMS is specifically designed for the industrial motive application environment and is adaptable to meet custom requirements.

 

 

Our Products

 

 

Our LiFT packs use lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) battery cells, which we source from a variety of overseas suppliers that meet our power, reliability, safety and other specifications. Because our BMS is not designed to work with a specific battery chemistry, we believe we can readily adapt our LiFT packs as new chemistries become available in the market or customer preferences change. We also offer 24-volt onboard chargers for our Class 3 Walkie LiFT packs, and smart “wall mounted” chargers for larger applications. Our smart charging solutions are designed to interface with our BMS.

 

Industry Overview

 

Driven by overall growth in global demand for lithium-ion battery solutions, the supply of lithium-ion batteries has rapidly expanded, leading to price declines of eighty-five percent (85%) since 2010 according to BloombergNEF. BloombergNEF also estimates that lithium-ion battery pack prices, which averaged $1,160 per kilowatt hour in 2010, were $176 per kWh in 2018 and could drop below $100 in 2024.

 

 

The sharp decline in the price of lithium-ion batteries has commenced a shift in customer preferences away from lead-acid and propane-based solutions for power lift equipment to lithium-ion based solutions. We believe our position as a pioneer in the field and our extensive experience providing lithium-ion based storage solutions makes us uniquely positioned to take advantage of this shift in customer preferences.

 

Lift Equipment - Material Handling Equipment

 

We focus on energy storage solutions for lift equipment and GSE because we believe they represent large and growing markets that are just beginning to adopt lithium-ion based technology. These markets include not only the sale of lithium-ion battery solutions for new equipment but also a replacement market for existing lead acid battery packs.

 

Historically, larger lift trucks were powered by internal combustion engines, using propane as a fuel, with smaller equipment powered by lead-acid batteries. Over the past thirty (30) years, there has been a significant shift toward electric power. According to Liftech/ITA, over this time period the percentage of lift trucks powered electrically has doubled from approximately thirty percent (30%) to over sixty percent (60%). 

 

According to McKinsey & Co., worldwide new lift truck orders reached approximately 1.4 million units in 2017 and had been over 1.2 million units per year for the prior five (5) years. The Industrial Truck Association has estimated that approximately 200,000 lift trucks had been sold yearly since 2013 in North America (Canada, the United States and Mexico), including approximately 253,000 units sold in 2017, with sales relatively evenly distributed between electric rider (Class 1 and Class 2), motorized hand (Class 3), and internal combustion engine powered lift trucks (Class 4 and Class 5). The ITA estimates that electric lift trucks represented approximately sixty-four percent (64%) of the North American market in 2017. Driven by growth in global manufacturing, e-commerce and construction, Research and Markets expects that the global lift truck market will grow at a compound annual growth rate of six and four-tenths percent (6.4%) through 2024.

 

Customers

 

Some of the end users of our LiFT packs include companies in a number of different industries, as shown in the graphic below:

 

  

Marketing and Sales

 

We sell our products through a number of different channels, including directly to end users, OEMs and lift equipment dealers or through battery distributors. Our four-person direct sales staff is assigned to major geographies nation-wide to collaborate with our sales partners who have an established customer base. In addition, we have developed a nation-wide sales network of relationships with equipment OEMs, their dealers, and battery distributors.

 

We have worked directly with a number of OEMs to secure “technical approval” for compatibility of our LiFT packs with their equipment. Once we receive that approval, we focus on developing a sales network utilizing existing battery distributors and equipment dealers, along with the OEM corporate national account sales force, to drive sales through this channel.

 

As our LiFT packs have gained acceptance in the marketplace, we have seen an increase in direct-to-end-customer sales, ranging from small enterprises to Fortune 500 companies. To expand our customer reach, we have begun to market directly to end users, primarily focusing on large fleets operated by Fortune 500 companies seeking productivity improvements.

 

To support our products, we have a nation-wide network of service providers, typically forklift equipment dealers and battery distributors, who provide local support to large customers. We also maintain a call center and provide Tech Bulletins and training to our service and sales network out of our corporate headquarters. Our warranty policy for forklift product lines includes a limited five-year warranty.

 

 

Risks Associated with Our Business

Our business is subject to a number of risks of which you should be aware before making a decision to invest in our common stock. These risks are more fully described in the section titled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 7 of this prospectus.

Corporate Information

 

We were incorporated in Nevada in 1998. In May 2012, we changed our name to Flux Power Holdings, Inc. We operate our business through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Flux Power, Inc. (Flux Power). Flux Power was incorporated in October 2009 to provide solutions to exploit the lithium-ion battery market for lift equipment and related verticals. Our principal executive office is located at 985 Poinsettia Avenue, Suite A, Vista, CA 92081. The telephone number at our principal executive office is (760) 741-3589 (FLUX).

 

 

 

THE OFFERING

 

Common Stock offered by us	shares of our common stock ( shares if the underwriters exercise the over-allotment option in full).
Common Stock to be outstanding after this offering	shares of common stock(1) ( shares if the underwriters exercise the over-allotment option in full).
Use of Proceeds	We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering for working capital and general corporate purposes. See ‘‘Use of Proceeds’’ on page 16 of this prospectus.
Risk Factors	Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 7.
OTCQB Symbol	Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “FLUX.”
Proposed NASDAQ Listing and symbol	We have applied to list our common stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “FLUX.” We will not consummate this offering unless our common stock is approved for listing on The NASDAQ Capital Market.

 

 

 

 

 

Except as otherwise indicated herein, all information in this prospectus reflects the 1 for 10 reverse split of our common stock effected on August 10, 2017, and assumes no exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option to purchase additional shares.

 

 

RISK FACTORS

 

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information included in this prospectus, before making an investment decision. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. You also should read the section entitled “Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements.”

Risk Factors Relating to Our Business

 

We have a history of losses and negative working capital.

 

For the nine months ended March 31, 2019, and the year ended June 30, 2018, we had net losses of $9,139,000 and $6,965,000, respectively. We have historically experienced net losses and until we generate sufficient revenue, we anticipate to continue to experience losses in the near future.

 

In addition, as of March 31, 2019 and June 30, 2018, we had a negative working capital of $488,000 and $7,446,000, respectively. As of March 31, 2019, we had a cash balance of $900,000. We expect that our existing cash balances, credit facilities, and the expected net proceeds of this offering will be sufficient to fund our existing and planned operations for the next twelve months from the date of this prospectus. Until such time as we generate sufficient cash to fund our operations, we will need additional capital to continue our operations thereafter.

 

We have relied on equity financings, borrowings under our credit facilities and/or previously cash flows from operating activities to fund our operations. However, there is no guarantee we will be able to obtain additional funds in the future or that funds will be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. See “Risk Factors” – “We will need to raise additional capital or financing after this offering to continue to execute and expand our business” and “We are dependent on our existing credit facility to finance our operations and in the event of default, such default could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.”

 

Any future financing may result in dilution of the ownership interests of our stockholders. If such funds are not available on acceptable terms, we may be required to curtail our operations or take other actions to preserve our cash, which may have a material adverse effect on our future cash flows and results of operations.

 

We will need to raise additional capital or financing after this offering to continue to execute and expand our business.

 

While we expect that our available cash, credit facilities, and the expected net proceeds from this offering will be sufficient to sustain our operations for the next twelve months from the date of this prospectus, we will need to raise additional capital after this offering to support our operations and execute on our business plan. We may be required to pursue sources of additional capital through various means, including joint venture projects, sale and leasing arrangements, and debt or equity financings. Any new securities that we may issue in the future may be sold on terms more favorable for our new investors than the terms of this offering. Newly issued securities may include preferences, superior voting rights, and the issuance of warrants or other convertible securities that will have additional dilutive effects. We cannot assure that additional funds will be available when needed from any source or, if available, will be available on terms that are acceptable to us. Further, we may incur substantial costs in pursuing future capital and/or financing, including investment banking fees, legal fees, accounting fees, printing and distribution expenses and other costs. We may also be required to recognize non-cash expenses in connection with certain securities we may issue, such as convertible notes and warrants, which will adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. Our ability to obtain needed financing may be impaired by such factors as the weakness of capital markets, and the fact that we have not been profitable, which could impact the availability and cost of future financings. If the amount of capital we are able to raise from financing activities, together with our revenues from operations, is not sufficient to satisfy our capital needs, we may have to reduce our operations accordingly.

 

 

We are dependent on our existing credit facility to finance our operations and in the event of default, such default could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

 

We have substantial indebtedness and have relied on our credit facilities to provide working capital. As of March 31, 2019 and June 30, 2018, we have an outstanding balance of $3,405,000 and $2,405,000, respectively, under an Amended and Restated Credit Facility Agreement dated March 28, 2019 (LOC) with Esenjay Investment, LLC (Esenjay), a majority shareholder and a company owned and controlled by Michael Johnson, a director, and Cleveland Capital, L.P., our minority stockholder (Cleveland and Esenjay, together with additional parties that may join as additional lenders, collectively the Lenders). We currently have $3,595,000 available for future draws. However, our ability to borrow under the LOC is at the discretion of the Lenders. Also, the Lenders have no obligation to disburse such funds and have the right not to advance funds under the LOC. In addition, as a secured party, upon an event of default, the Lenders will have a right to the collateral granted to them under the line of credit, and we may lose our ownership interest in the assets. A loss of our collateral will have material adverse effect on our operations, our business and financial condition.

 

Our independent auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

 

In their audit report issued in connection with our financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2018, and for the years then ended, our independent registered public accounting firm included a going concern explanatory paragraph which stated there was substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  We have prepared our financial statements on a going concern basis that contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that would be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern and, therefore, be required to liquidate our assets and discharge our liabilities in other than the normal course of business and at amounts different from those reflected in our financial statements.  If we are unable to continue as a going concern, our stockholders may lose all or a substantial portion or all of their investment.

 

We are dependent on a few customers for the majority of our net revenues, and our success depends on demand from OEMs and other users of our battery products.

 

Historically a majority of our product sales were generated from a small number of OEMs and end-user customers, including two customers who made up 77% of our sales for the year ended June 30, 2018. As a result, our success depends on demand from this small group of customers and their willingness to incorporate our battery products in their equipment. The loss of a significant customer would have an adverse effect on our revenues. There is no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts to convince end users to accept our products. Our failure to gain acceptance of our products could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Additionally, OEMs, their dealers and battery distributors may be subject to changes in demand for their equipment which could significantly affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We do not have long term contracts with our customers. 

 

We do not have long-term contracts with our customers. Future agreements with respect to pricing, returns, promotions, among other things, are subject to periodic negotiation with each customer. No assurance can be given that our customers will continue to do business with us. The loss of any of our significant customers will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. In addition, the uncertainty of product orders can make it difficult to forecast our sales and allocate our resources in a manner consistent with actual sales, and our expense levels are based in part on our expectations of future sales. If our expectations regarding future sales are inaccurate, we may be unable to reduce costs in a timely manner to adjust for sales shortfalls.

 

 

Real or perceived hazards associated with Lithium-ion battery technology may affect demand for our products.

 

Press reports have highlighted situations in which lithium-ion batteries in automobiles and consumer products have caught fire or exploded. In response, the use and transportation of lithium-ion batteries has been prohibited or restricted in certain circumstances. This publicity has resulted in a public perception that lithium-ion batteries are dangerous and unpredictable. Although we believe our battery packs are safe, these perceived hazards may result in customer reluctance to adopt our lithium-ion based technology.

 

Our products may experience quality problems from time to time that could result in negative publicity, litigation, product recalls and warranty claims, which could result in decreased revenues and harm to our brands.

 

A catastrophic failure of our battery modules could cause personal or property damages for which we would be potentially liable. Damage to or the failure of our battery packs to perform to customer specifications could result in unexpected warranty expenses or result in a product recall, which would be time consuming and expensive. Such circumstances could result in negative publicity or lawsuits filed against us related to the perceived quality of our products which could harm our brand and decrease demand for our products.

 

We may be subject to product liability claims.

 

If one of our products were to cause injury to someone or cause property damage, including as a result of product malfunctions, defects, or improper installation, then we could be exposed to product liability claims. We could incur significant costs and liabilities if we are sued and if damages are awarded against us. Further, any product liability claim we face could be expensive to defend and could divert management’s attention. The successful assertion of a product liability claim against us could result in potentially significant monetary damages, penalties or fines, subject us to adverse publicity, damage our reputation and competitive position, and adversely affect sales of our products. In addition, product liability claims, injuries, defects, or other problems experienced by other companies in the solar industry could lead to unfavorable market conditions for the industry as a whole, and may have an adverse effect on our ability to attract new customers, thus harming our growth and financial performance. Although we carry product liability insurance, it may be insufficient in amount to cover our claims.

 

Tariffs that might be imposed on lithium-ion batteries by the United States government or a resulting trade war could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

 

In 2018, the United States government announced tariffs on certain steel and aluminum products imported into the United States, which has led to reciprocal tariffs being imposed by the European Union and other governments on products imported from the United States. The United States government has implemented tariffs on goods imported from China, and additional tariffs on goods imported from China are under consideration.

 

The lithium-ion battery industry has not been subjected to tariffs implemented by the United States government on goods imported from China. If the U.S. and China are not able to resolve their differences, new and additional tariffs may be put in place and additional products, including lithium-ion batteries, may become subject to tariffs. Since all of our lithium-ion batteries are manufactured in China, potential tariffs on lithium-ion batteries imported by us from China would increase our costs, require us to increase prices to our customers or, if we are unable to do so, result in lower gross margins on the products sold by us.

 

The President of the United States has, at times, threatened to institute even wider ranging tariffs on all goods imported from China. China has already imposed tariffs on a wide range of American products in retaliation for the American tariffs on steel and aluminum. Additional tariffs could be imposed by China in response to actual or threatened tariffs on products imported from China. The imposition of additional tariffs by the United States could trigger the adoption of tariffs by other countries as well. Any resulting escalation of trade tensions, including a “trade war,” could have a significant adverse effect on world trade and the world economy, as well as on our results of operations. At this time, we cannot predict how the recently enacted tariffs will impact our business.  Tariffs on components imported by us from China could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

 

 

Economic conditions may adversely affect consumer spending and the overall general health of our retail customers, which, in turn, may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash resources.

 

Uncertainty about the existing and future global economic conditions may cause our customers to defer purchases or cancel purchase orders for our products in response to tighter credit, decreased cash availability and weakened consumer confidence. Our financial success is sensitive to changes in general economic conditions, both globally and nationally. Recessionary economic cycles, higher interest borrowing rates, higher fuel and other energy costs, inflation, increases in commodity prices, higher levels of unemployment, higher consumer debt levels, higher tax rates and other changes in tax laws or other economic factors that may affect consumer spending or buying habits could continue to adversely affect the demand for our products. If credit pressures or other financial difficulties result in insolvency for our customers it could adversely impact our financial results. There can be no assurances that government and consumer responses to the disruptions in the financial markets will restore consumer confidence.

 

We are dependent on a limited number of suppliers for our battery cells, and the inability of these suppliers to continue to deliver, or their refusal to deliver, our battery cells at prices and volumes acceptable to us would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects and operating results.

 

We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities. Our battery cells, which are an integral part of our battery products and systems, are sourced from one manufacturer, which is located in China and has distribution in the United States. While we obtain components for our products and systems from multiple sources whenever possible, we have spent a great deal of time in developing and testing our battery cells that we receive from this manufacturer. We refer to the battery cell supplier as our limited source supplier. To date, we have no qualified alternative sources for our battery cells although we research and assess cells from other suppliers on an ongoing basis. We generally do not maintain long-term agreements with our limited source suppliers. While we believe that we will be able to establish an additional supplier relationship for our battery cells, we may be unable to do so in the short term or at all at prices, quality or costs that are favorable to us.

 

Changes in business conditions, wars, regulatory requirements, economic conditions and cycles, governmental changes and other factors beyond our control could also affect our suppliers’ ability to deliver components to us on a timely basis or cause us to terminate our relationship with them and require us to find replacements, which we may have difficulty doing. Furthermore, if we experience significant increased demand, or need to replace our existing suppliers, there can be no assurance that additional supplies of component parts will be available when required on terms that are favorable to us, at all, or that any supplier would allocate sufficient supplies to us in order to meet our requirements or fill our orders in a timely manner. In the past, we have replaced certain suppliers because of their failure to provide components that met our quality control standards. The loss of any limited source supplier or the disruption in the supply of components from these suppliers could lead to delays in the deliveries of our battery products and systems to our customers, which could hurt our relationships with our customers and also materially adversely affect our business, prospects and operating results.

 

Increases in costs, disruption of supply or shortage of raw materials, in particular lithium-ion phosphate cells, could harm our business.

 

We may experience increases in the costs or a sustained interruption in the supply or shortage of raw materials. Any such increase or supply interruption could materially negatively impact our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results. For instance, we are exposed to multiple risks relating to price fluctuations for lithium-iron phosphate cells.

  

 

These risks include:

 

 

 

 

  Our business may be subject to disruption as a result of the planned relocation of our production facility.

 

We are in the process of relocating and expanding our production facility. We may experience disruption to our business as a result of that relocation due to factors beyond our control. Any prolonged business interruption may adversely affect our business, prospects and operating results. If we fail to meet demand from our customers due to insufficient production capacity or as a result of prolong interruption to our business as a result of the relocation, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

 

In connection with the relocation and expanding of our production facility, our new facility will have to be recertified for ISO 9001 compliance. We may be required to incur unforeseen costs or be subject to unexpected delays in connection with obtaining such certification.

 

Our success depends on our ability to develop new products and capabilities that respond to customer demand, industry trends or actions by our competitors and failure to do so may cause us to lose our competitiveness in the battery industry and may cause our profits to decline.

 

Our success will depend on our ability to develop new products and capabilities that respond to customer demand, industry trends or actions by our competitors. There is no assurance that we will be able to successfully develop new products and capabilities that adequately respond to these forces. In addition, changes in legislative, regulatory or industry requirements or in competitive technologies may render certain of our products obsolete or less attractive. If we are unable to offer products and capabilities that satisfy customer demand, respond adequately to changes in industry trends or legislative changes and maintain our competitive position in our markets, our financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

 

The research and development of new products and technologies is costly and time consuming, and there are no assurances that our research and development of new products will be either successful or completed within anticipated timeframes, if at all. Our failure to technologically evolve and/or develop new or enhanced products may cause us to lose competitiveness in the battery market. In addition, in order to compete effectively in the renewable battery industry, we must be able to launch new products to meet our customers’ demands in a timely manner. However, we cannot provide assurance that we will be able to install and certify any equipment needed to produce new products in a timely manner, or that the transitioning of our manufacturing facility and resources to full production under any new product programs will not impact production rates or other operational efficiency measures at our manufacturing facility. In addition, new product introductions and applications are risky, and may suffer from a lack of market acceptance, delays in related product development and failure of new products to operate properly. Any failure by us to successfully launch new products, or a failure by our customers to accept such products, could adversely affect our results.

 

Our business will be adversely affected if we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights from unauthorized use or infringement by third parties.

 

Any failure to protect our proprietary rights adequately could result in our competitors offering similar products, potentially resulting in the loss of some of our competitive advantage and a decrease in our revenue, which would adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results. Our success depends, at least in part, on our ability to protect our core technology and intellectual property. To accomplish this, we rely on a combination of patents, patent applications, trade secrets, including know-how, employee and third party nondisclosure agreements, copyright laws, trademarks, intellectual property licenses and other contractual rights to establish and protect our proprietary rights in our technology.

 

 

The protection provided by the patent laws is and will be important to our future opportunities. However, such patents and agreements and various other measures we take to protect our intellectual property from use by others may not be effective for various reasons, including the following:

 

 

 

 

Our patent applications may not result in issued patents, which may have a material adverse effect on our ability to prevent others from commercially exploiting products similar to ours.

 

Our patent applications may not result in issued patents, which may have a material adverse effect on our ability to prevent others from commercially exploiting products similar to ours.

 

We cannot be certain that we are the first creator of inventions covered by pending patent applications or the first to file patent applications on these inventions, nor can we be certain that our pending patent applications will result in issued patents or that any of our issued patents will afford protection against a competitor. In addition, patent applications that we intend to file in foreign countries are subject to laws, rules and procedures that differ from those of the United States, and thus we cannot be certain that foreign patent applications related to issue United States patents will be issued. Furthermore, if these patent applications issue, some foreign countries provide significantly less effective patent enforcement than in the United States.

 

The status of patents involves complex legal and factual questions and the breadth of claims allowed is uncertain. As a result, we cannot be certain that the patent applications that we file will result in patents being issued, or that our patents and any patents that may be issued to us in the near future will afford protection against competitors with similar technology. In addition, patents issued to us may be infringed upon or designed around by others and others may obtain patents that we need to license or design around, either of which would increase costs and may adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

 

We rely on trade secret protections through confidentiality agreements with our employees, customers and other parties; the breach of such agreements could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

 

We rely on trade secrets, which we seek to protect, in part, through confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements with our employees, customers and other parties. There can be no assurance that these agreements will not be breached, that we would have adequate remedies for any such breach or that our trade secrets will not otherwise become known to or independently developed by competitors. To the extent that consultants, key employees or other third parties apply technological information independently developed by them or by others to our proposed projects, disputes may arise as to the proprietary rights to such information that may not be resolved in our favor. We may be involved from time to time in litigation to determine the enforceability, scope and validity of our proprietary rights. Any such litigation could result in substantial cost and diversion of effort by our management and technical personnel.

 

Our business depends substantially on the continuing efforts of the members of our senior management team, and our business may be severely disrupted if we lose their services.

 

We believe that our success is largely dependent upon the continued service of the members of our senior management team, who are critical to establishing our corporate strategies and focus, and ensuring our continued growth. We are a smaller company with a limited number of personnel. Because of this dependence, the Company may be more adversely affected by the loss of a member of our senior management than at a larger company. Our continued success will depend on our ability to attract and retain a qualified and competent management team in order to manage our existing operations and support our expansion plans. Although we are not aware of any change, if any of the members of our senior management team are unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, we may not be able to replace them readily. Therefore, our business may be severely disrupted, and we may incur additional expenses to recruit and retain their replacement. In addition, if any of the members of our senior management team joins a competitor or forms a competing company, we may lose some of our customers.

 

 

We may be required to obtain the approval of various government agencies to market our products.

 

Our products are subject to product safety regulations by Federal, state, and local organizations. Accordingly, we may be required, or may voluntarily determine to, obtain approval of our products from one or more of the organizations engaged in regulating product safety. These approvals could require significant time and resources from our technical staff, and, if redesign were necessary, could result in a delay in the introduction of our products in various markets and applications. There can be no assurance that we will obtain any or all of the approvals that may be required to market our products.

 

We may face significant costs relating to environmental regulations for the storage and shipment of our lithium-ion battery packs.

 

Federal, state, and local regulations impose significant environmental requirements on the manufacture, storage, transportation, and disposal of various components of advanced energy storage systems. Although we believe that our operations are in material compliance with applicable environmental regulations, there can be no assurance that changes in such laws and regulations will not impose costly compliance requirements on us or otherwise subject us to future liabilities. Moreover, Federal, state, and local governments may enact additional regulations relating to the manufacture, storage, transportation, and disposal of components of advanced energy storage systems. Compliance with such additional regulations could require us to devote significant time and resources and could adversely affect demand for our products. There can be no assurance that additional or modified regulations relating to the manufacture, storage, transportation, and disposal of components of advanced energy systems will not be imposed.

 

Natural disasters, public health crises, political crises and other catastrophic events or other events outside of our control may damage our sole facility or the facilities of third parties on which we depend, and could impact consumer spending.

 

Our sole production facility is located in southern California near major geologic faults that have experienced earthquakes in the past. An earthquake or other natural disaster or power shortages or outages could disrupt our operations or impair critical systems. Any of these disruptions or other events outside of our control could affect our business negatively, harming our operating results. In addition, if our sole facility, or the facilities of our suppliers, third-party service providers or customers, is affected by natural disasters, such as earthquakes, tsunamis, power shortages or outages, floods or monsoons, public health crises, such as pandemics and epidemics, political crises, such as terrorism, war, political instability or other conflict, or other events outside of our control, our business and operating results could suffer. Moreover, these types of events could negatively impact consumer spending in the impacted regions or, depending upon the severity, globally, which could adversely impact our operating results. Similar disasters occurring at our vendors’ manufacturing facilities could impact our reputation and our consumers’ perception of our brands.

 

Risks Related to the Offering, Our Common Stock and Market

 

If you purchase shares of common stock in this offering, you will suffer immediate and substantial dilution of your investment.

 

Because the public offering price per share of our common stock in this offering is expected to exceed the net tangible book value per share of our common stock, you will suffer immediate and substantial dilution in the net tangible book value of the common stock you purchase in this offering. Therefore, if you purchase shares of our common stock in this offering, you may pay a price per share that substantially exceeds our net tangible book value per share after this offering. Assuming the sale of shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $per share, the closing bid price of our common stock on the OTCQB on , 2019, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by us, you will incur immediate dilution of $per share. See the section entitled “Dilution” below for a more detailed discussion of the dilution you will incur if you participate in this offering. To the extent shares are issued under outstanding options and warrants at exercise prices lower than the public offering price of our common stock in this offering, you will incur further dilution.

 

 

You may experience future dilution as a result of future equity offerings.

 

In order to raise additional capital, we may at any time offer additional shares of our common stock or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock at prices that may not be the same as the price per share in this offering. We may sell shares or other securities in any other offering at a price per share that is less than the public offering price per share in this offering, and investors purchasing shares or other securities in the future could have rights superior to existing stockholders. The price per share at which we sell additional shares of our common stock, or securities convertible or exchangeable into common stock, in future transactions may be higher or lower than the public offering price per share paid by investors in this offering.

 

We have broad discretion in the use of our cash and cash equivalents, including the net proceeds we receive in this offering, and may not use them effectively.

 

Our management has broad discretion to use our cash and cash equivalents, including the net proceeds we receive in this offering, to fund our operations and could spend these funds in ways that do not improve our results of operations or enhance the value of our common stock, and you will not have the opportunity as part of your investment decision to assess whether the net proceeds are being used appropriately. The failure by our management to apply these funds effectively could result in financial losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, cause the price of our common stock to decline. Pending their use to fund our operations, we may invest our cash and cash equivalents, including the net proceeds from this offering, in a manner that does not produce income or that loses value.

 

The market price of our common stock can become volatile, leading to the possibility of its value being depressed at a time when you may want to sell your holdings.

 

The market price of our common stock can become volatile. Numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly. These factors include:

 

 

 

The ownership of our stock is highly concentrated in our management, and we have one controlling stockholder.

 

As of April 30, 2019, our directors and executive officers, and their respective affiliates beneficially owned approximately 65.6% of our outstanding common stock, including common stock underlying options, warrants and convertible debt that were exercisable or convertible or which would become exercisable or convertible within 60 days.  Michael Johnson, our director and beneficial owner of Esenjay, beneficially owns approximately 61.4% of such outstanding common stock.  As a result of their ownership, our directors and executive officers and their respective affiliates collectively, and Esenjay, individually, are able to significantly influence all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions.  This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control.

 

We do not intend to pay dividends on shares of our common stock for the foreseeable future.

 

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on shares of our common stock. We intend to retain any future earnings to fund the operation and expansion of our business and, therefore, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future.

 

Our common stock is illiquid and the lack of liquidity may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

 

The trading volume of our common stock is relatively small. Because of the lack of liquidity in our common stock, small fluctuations in the demand for our common stock may have significant impact on the trading price of our common stock. The lack of liquidity may impact your ability to sell your shares of common stock at an acceptable price, if at all.

 

Preferred Stock may be issued under our Articles of Incorporation which may have superior rights to our common stock.

 

Our Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, the terms of which may be determined at the time of issuance. These terms may include voting rights including the right to vote as a series on particular matters, preferences as to dividends and liquidation, conversion rights, redemption rights and sinking fund provisions. In addition, these voting, conversion and exchange rights of preferred stock could negatively affect the voting power or other rights of our common stockholders. The issuance of any preferred stock could diminish the rights of holders of our common stock, or delay or prevent a change of control of our Company, and therefore could reduce the value of such common stock.

  

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are contained principally in the sections entitled “Description of Business,” “Risk Factors,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the factors described in the section captioned “Risk Factors” below. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “would,” and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties. You should read these factors and the other cautionary statements made in this prospectus and in the documents we incorporate by reference into this prospectus as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this prospectus or the documents we incorporate by reference into this prospectus. If one or more of these factors materialize, or if any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results, performance or achievements may vary materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

 

 

Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements relating to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also, forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this prospectus. You should read this prospectus and the documents that we reference and file as exhibits to this prospectus completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

 

We obtained statistical data, market data and other industry data and forecasts used throughout this Prospectus from market research, publicly available information and industry publications which we believe are reliable. However, investors should not place undue reliance on such information.

 

Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this prospectus concerning our industry and the markets in which we operate is based on information obtained by us from various sources, including independent industry publications, which we believe to be reliable. In presenting this information, we have also made assumptions based on such data and other similar sources, and on our knowledge of, and our experience to date in, the potential markets for our products. The industry in which we operate is subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in the section entitled “Risk Factors.” Accordingly, investors should not unduly rely on such estimates.

 

USE OF PROCEEDS

 

We estimate that the net proceeds from this offering will be approximately $ ($ if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full), after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

 

We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering for working capital and general corporate purposes. We will retain broad discretion over the use of the net proceeds of this offering. Pending such use, we intend to invest the net proceeds in interest-bearing investment-grade securities or government securities.

 

 

MARKET INFORMATION

 

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB under the stock symbol “FLUX.” The following table sets forth the high and low closing bid prices for our common stock during each quarter for the past two fiscal years and the current fiscal year as set forth below. The information presented below has been adjusted retroactively to reflect the 1 for 10 reverse stock split of our common stock, effective August 10, 2017. Such prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

 

Year Ending June 30, 2019	High	Low
First Quarter	$3.20	$1.40
Second Quarter	$2.35	$1.01
Third Quarter	$1.85	$1.12
Fourth Quarter (through May 23, 2019)	$1.60	$0.80

Year Ended June 30, 2018	High	Low
First Quarter	$1.00	$0.39
Second Quarter	$0.63	$0.14
Third Quarter	$0.52	$0.35
Fourth Quarter	$3.35	$0.44

Year Ended June 30, 2017	High	Low
First Quarter	$0.50	$0.38
Second Quarter	$0.42	$0.15
Third Quarter	$0.55	$0.33
Fourth Quarter	$0.50	$0.24

 

Holders of Common Stock

   

As of April 30, 2019, we had approximately 1,400 record holders of our common stock, based on information provided by our transfer agent. The foregoing number of record holders does not include an unknown number of stockholders who hold their stock in “street name.”

  

Dividend Policy

 

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends. We presently do not expect to declare or pay such dividends in the foreseeable future and expect to reinvest all undistributed earnings to expand our operations, which the management believes would be of the most benefit to our stockholders. The declaration of dividends, if any, will be subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors, which may consider such factors as our results of operations, financial condition, capital needs and acquisition strategy, among others. Therefore, there can be no assurance that any dividends on our common stock will ever be paid.

 

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

Information for our equity compensation plans in effect as of June 30, 2018 is as follows:

 

	(a)	(b)	(c)
	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column a)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)	3,165,000	0.76	6,835,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(2)	379,000	1.43	-
Total	3,544,000	0.74	6,835,000

 

 

 

 

CAPITALIZATION

 

The following table sets forth our capitalization, as of March 31, 2019:

 

 

 

You should read the forgoing table together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for The Company” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

	As of March 31, 2019
	Actual (Unaudited)	Pro Forma (Unaudited)
Total long-term liabilities:	$125,000
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding	-
Class common stock, $0.001 par value, 300,000,000 share authorized, 51,000,868 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2019, shares issued and outstanding as adjusted	$51,000
Additional paid in capital	$35,405,000
Accumulated deficit	$(35,801,000)
Total Stockholders’ equity (deficit)	$(345,000)
Total Capitalization	$5,924,000

 

The as adjusted information discussed above is illustrative only and will be adjusted based on the actual public offering price and other terms of this offering determined between us and the underwriters at pricing.

 

The table and discussion above are based on 51,000,868 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2019, and excludes, as of that date, the following:

 

 

 

  

 

DILUTION

 

If you invest in our common stock in this offering, your ownership interest will be diluted immediately to the extent of the difference between the public offering price per share of our common stock and the as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately after this offering. As of March 31, 2019, we had a net tangible book value of approximately $(345,000) or approximately $(0.007) per share. Net tangible book value per share represents our total tangible assets, less total liabilities, divided by the number of shares of common stock outstanding. After giving effect to the assumed sale of shares of our common stock in this offering at an assumed public offering price of $ per share, the closing bid price per share of our common stock on the OTCQB on , 2019, and after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by us, our as adjusted net tangible book value per share as of March 31, 2019, would have been approximately $ or approximately $ per share. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value per share of $ to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of approximately $ per share to new investors purchasing shares of our common stock in this offering.

 

The following table illustrates this dilution on a per share basis:

 

Assumed public offering price per share		$
Net tangible book value per share at March 31, 2019	$(0.007)
Increase in book value per share attributable to new investors	$
As adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering		$
Dilution per share to new investors		$

 

If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, our as adjusted net tangible book value would be approximately $ million, or approximately $ per share, representing an increase in the net tangible book value to existing stockholders of approximately would be $ per share and immediate dilution of approximately $ per share to new investors purchasing shares of our common stock in this offering.

 

The table and discussion above are based on 51,000,868 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2019, and excludes, as of that date, the following:

 

 

 

 

In addition, we may choose to raise additional capital in the future. To the extent that capital is raised through equity or convertible securities, the issuance of those securities may result in further dilution to the holders of common stock.

 

 

 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed below and elsewhere in this prospectus.

Overview

We design, develop and sell advanced rechargeable lithium-ion energy storage solutions for lift trucks, airport ground support equipment (GSE) and other industrial motive applications. Our “LiFT” battery packs, including our proprietary battery management system (BMS), provide our customers with a better performing, cheaper and more environmentally friendly alternative, in many instances, to traditional lead-acid and propane-based solutions.

 

We have received Underwriters Laboratory (UL) Listing on our Class 3 Walkie Pallet Jack (Class 3 Walkie) LiFT pack product line in 2016 and expect to seek UL Listing during calendar 2019 for our other product lines, which include, Class 1 Counterbalance/Sit down/Ride-on (Class 1 Ride-on) LiFT packs, Class 2 Narrow Aisle LiFT packs, and Class 3 End Rider LiFT packs. We believe that a UL Listing demonstrates the safety, reliability and durability of our products and gives us an important competitive advantage over other lithium-ion energy suppliers. Our Class 3 Walkie LiFT packs have been approved for use by leading industrial motive manufacturers, including Toyota Material Handling USA, Inc., Crown Equipment Corporation, and Raymond Corporation.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates based on our historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

We believe the following critical accounting policies and estimates affect the preparation of our financial statements:

 

Accounts Receivable

 

Accounts receivable are carried at their estimated collectible amounts. We have not experienced collections issues related to our accounts receivable and have not recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts during the nine months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 and the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.

 

Inventories

 

Inventories consist primarily of battery management systems, lithium-ion battery cells, and the related subcomponents, and are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or net realizable value. We evaluate our inventories to determine if write-downs are necessary due to obsolescence or if the inventory levels are in excess of anticipated demand at market value based on consideration of historical sales and product development plans. We recorded adjustments related to obsolete inventory in the amount of approximately $4,000 and $22,000 during the nine months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and approximately $27,000 and $56,000 during the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

  

 

Revenue Recognition

 

We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, price is fixed or determinable, and collectability of the selling price is reasonably assured. Delivery occurs when risk of loss is passed to the customer, as specified by the terms of the applicable customer agreements. When a product is sold on consignment, the item remains in our inventory and revenue is not recognized until the product is ultimately sold to the end user. When a right of return exists, contractually or implied, we recognize revenue when the product is sold through to the end user. As of nine month ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, and as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, we did not have any deferred revenue.

 

Product Warranties

 

We evaluate our exposure to product warranty obligations based on historical experience. Our products, primarily lift equipment packs, are warrantied for five years unless modified by a separate agreement. As of March 31, 2019 and 2018, we had warranty liability of approximately $298,000 and $105,000, respectively, and as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, we had warranty liability of approximately $158,000 and $85,000, respectively, which is included in accrued expenses on our consolidated balance sheets.

 

Derivative Financial Instruments

  

We do not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risk.

 

Stock-based Compensation

 

Pursuant to the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic No. 718-10, Compensation-Stock Compensation, which establishes accounting for equity instruments exchanged for employee service, we utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of employee stock option awards at the date of grant, which requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including expected volatility and expected life. Changes in these inputs and assumptions can materially affect the measure of estimated fair value of our share-based compensation. These assumptions are subjective and generally require significant analysis and judgment to develop. When estimating fair value, some of the assumptions will be based on, or determined from, external data and other assumptions may be derived from our historical experience with stock-based payment arrangements. The appropriate weight to place on historical experience is a matter of judgment, based on relevant facts and circumstances.

 

Common stock or equity instruments such as warrants issued for services to non-employees are valued at their estimated fair value at the measurement date (the date when a firm commitment for performance of the services is reached, typically the date of issuance, or when performance is complete). If the total value exceeds the par value of the stock issued, the value in excess of the par value is added to the additional paid-in-capital.

 

Segment and Related Information

 

We operate as a single reportable segment.

 

 

Results of Operations and Financial Condition

 

	Three months ended March 31,				Nine months ended March 31,
	2019		2018		2019		2018
	$	% of Revenues	$	% of Revenues	$	% of Revenues	$	% of Revenues
Net revenue	$1,751,000	100%	$1,666,000	100%	$6,297,000	100%	$3,020,000	100%
Cost of sales	1,690,000	97%	1,816,000	109%	5,968,000	95%	3,728,000	123%
Gross profit (loss)	61,000	3%	(150,000)	-9%	329,000	5%	(708,000)	-23%
Operating expenses:
Selling and administrative expenses	2,421,000	138%	909,000	55%	5,518,000	88%	2,378,000	79%
Research and development	1,364,000	78%	483,000	29%	2,892,000	46%	1,441,000	48%
Total operating expenses	3,785,000	216%	1,392,000	84%	8,410,000	134%	3,819,000	126%
Operating loss	(3,724,000)	-213%	(1,542,000)	-93%	(8,081,000)	-128%	(4,527,000)	-150%
Other income (expense):
Interest expense	(90,000)	-5%	(211,000)	-13%	(1,058,000)	-17%	(512,000)	-17%
Net loss	$(3,814,000)	-218%	$(1,753,000)	-105%	$(9,139,000)	-145%	$(5,039,000)	-167%

 

 

Comparison of Results of Operations For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018

 

Revenues

 

Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2019 were $1,751,000, an increase by $85,000 or 5%, compared to revenues of $1,666,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2018. During three months ended March 31, 2019, we sold LiFT packs from our full family of products for Class 3 Walkie and End Riders, Class 2 Narrow Aisle, Class 1 Ride-on, and GSE as compared to the sale of primarily Class 3 Walkie LiFT packs for the three months ended March 31, 2018. During this fiscal year 2019 and with the introduction of our full “family” of forklift battery packs, we are seeing an increasing mix shift from lower power rated packs to much higher power rated packs, that have a direct correlation to pricing, and our revenue. Over the next twelve months, we anticipate this mix shift continue with the increased sales of the larger power rated packs.

   

Cost of Sales

 

Cost of sales for three months ended March 31, 2019 decreased $126,000, or 7%, compared to three months ended March 31, 2018. The Company’s development efforts and improvements to our products have resulted in reductions in inventory costs, improved workforce efficiencies, and reduced warranty expense, which have all contributed to an improvement in the gross margin percentage by 12% in three months ended March 31, 2019, compared to three months ended March 31, 2018. We expect continued improvements to the gross margin percentage as the sales volumes increase, assembly productivity improves, and cost reductions are achieved.

 

Selling and Administrative Expenses 

 

Selling and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and personnel related expenses, stock-based compensation expense, public company costs, consulting costs, professional fees and other expenses. Such expenses for three months ended March 31, 2019 increased $1,530,000 or 172%, compared to three months ended March 31, 2018. This increase is primarily due to a significant increase in stock based compensation related to new option grants.

  

Research and Development Expense

 

Research and development expenses for three months ended March 31, 2019 increased $881,000 or 182%, compared to three months ended March 31, 2018. Such expenses consist primarily of materials, supplies, salaries and personnel related expenses, stock-based compensation expense, and other expenses associated with the continued development of our full family of products for LiFT pack and GSE. During three months ended March 31, 2019, we have continued to focus our efforts in developing lithium-ion battery packs for Class 1 and Class 2 forklifts. We initiated the UL Listing process on our Class 1 pack and our new BMS in January 2019. The impact of these efforts is expected to continue to be seen throughout the remainder of calendar 2019, as we schedule our remaining family of forklift packs for UL Listing. We anticipate research and development expenses continuing to be a sizeable portion of our expenses as we continue to develop new and improved products to our product line.

  

Interest Expense

 

Interest expense for three months ended March 31, 2019 decreased $121,000 or 57%, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2018, and consists of interest expense related to our outstanding lines of credit and convertible promissory note.

  

Net Loss

 

Net loss for three months ended March 31, 2019 increased $2,061,000 or 118%, as compared to the net loss in three months ended March 31, 2018.  The increase is primarily attributable to increased staff and development expenses related to expanding our products line, our growing sales department, interest expense, and increased stock-based compensation costs. As we continue to increase sales of our packs, we anticipate being able to take advantage of greater quantity discounts thus improving our gross margin.

 

 

Comparison of Results of Operations For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018

 

Revenues

 

Revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2019, was $6,297,000, an increase of $3,277,000, or 109%, compared to revenues of $3,020,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2018. The increase in revenues resulted primarily from the sale of Class 3 Walkie Lift packs to existing customers. In addition a portion of the revenue increase resulted from sales of across our full family of products for Class 3 Walkie and End Riders, Class 2 Narrow Aisle, Class 1 Ride-on, and GSE during the nine months ended March 31, 2019. During this fiscal year 2019 and with the introduction of our full “family” of forklift battery packs, we are seeing an increasing mix shift from lower power rated packs to much higher power rated packs, that have a direct correlation to pricing, and our revenue. Over the next twelve months, we anticipate this mix shift continue with the increased sales of the larger power rated packs.

 

Cost of Sales

 

Cost of sales during the nine months ended March 31, 2019, increased $2,240,000, or 60%, compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2018. The increase in cost of sales resulted primarily from the increase in pack sales as discussed above offset by decreased cost for inventory, and lower warranty expense as a percentage of revenue resulting in a gross margin percentage increase of 28% for the nine months ended March 31, 2019 compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2018.

 

Selling and Administrative Expenses 

 

Selling and administrative expenses for the nine months ended March 31, 2019 increased $3,158,000, or 134%, compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2018. The increase is primarily attributable to increases in staff, higher stock-based compensation as discussed above regarding March 31, 2019, and additional professional fees.

 

Research and Development Expense

 

Research and development expenses for the nine months ended March 31, 2019 increased $1,451,000, or 101%, compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2018 due to our continued focus in developing lithium-ion battery packs for Class 1 forklifts, Class 2 forklifts, Class 3 end riders, and GSE.

 

Interest Expense

 

Interest expense during the nine months ended March 31, 2019 increased $546,000, or 107%, and consists primarily of interest expense related to our outstanding lines of credit and convertible promissory note. Also included in interest expense during the nine months ended March 31, 2019 is additional interest expense of approximately $466,000 agreed to be paid under the Early Note Conversion Agreement, dated October 31, 2018, with Esenjay, as origination fees of $25,000 for the shareholder lines of credit.

 

Net Loss

 

Net loss for the nine months ended March 31, 2019 increased $4,118,000, or 82%, as compared to net loss for the nine months ended March 31, 2018 for the reasons stated above.

  

 

 

	Fiscal 2018		Fiscal 2017
	$	% of Revenues	$	% of Revenues
Revenues	$4,118,000	100%	$902,000	100%
Cost of goods sold	4,913,000	119%	1,622,000	180%
Gross loss	(795,000)	-19%	(720,000)	-80%
Operating expenses
Selling and administrative expenses	3,462,000	84%	2,404,000	267%
Research and development	1,956,000	47%	1,052,000	117%
Total operating expenses	5,418,000	132%	3,456,000	384%
Operating loss	(6,213,000)	-151%	(4,176,000)	-464%
Other income (expenses)
Change in fair value derivative liabilities		0%	14,000	2%
Interest expense, net	(752,000)	-18%	(273,000)	-30%
Net loss	$(6,965,000)	-169%	$(4,435,000)	-492%

 

Revenues

 

Revenues for Fiscal 2018 increased $3,216,000, or 357%, compared to Fiscal 2017. This increase in revenues during Fiscal 2018 was primarily attributable to sales of Class 3 Walkie LiFT packs to one major customer beginning in November 2017. A portion of the revenue increase also resulted from the sale of GSE.

 

Cost of Sales

 

Cost of sales for Fiscal 2018 increased $3,291,000, or 203%, compared to Fiscal 2017. The increase in cost of sales was directly attributable to the increase in revenues during Fiscal 2018. The cost of materials per LiFT pack in Fiscal 2018 decreased compared to Fiscal 2017 as higher purchase quantities resulted in lower costs of materials per pack. Despite the improvement in lower costs per pack, we have continued to recognize a gross loss during Fiscal 2018 as we remain subject to low volume purchases, higher cost designs from more costly initial designs and limited sourcing related to our inventory purchases. Warranty expense for Fiscal 2018 increased as a result of the higher sales volume. As of June 30, 2018, we had approximately $158,000 accrued for product warranty liability. 

 

Selling and Administrative Expenses

 

Selling and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and personnel related expenses, stock-based compensation expense, public company costs, consulting costs, professional fees and other expenses. Such expenses for Fiscal 2018 increased $1,058,000, or 44%, compared to Fiscal 2017. The increase was primarily attributable to increased marketing expense for the promotion of new products, additional payroll costs and stock based compensation related to new employees, and additional legal fees for capital raises.

 

Research and Development

Research and development expenses for Fiscal 2018 increased $904,000, or 86%, compared to Fiscal 2017. Such expenses consist primarily of materials, supplies, salaries and personnel related expenses, testing costs, consulting costs, and other expenses associated with the continued development of our LiFT pack, as well as, research into new product opportunities. The increase in expenses in Fiscal 2018 was primarily due to the development and implementation of the higher capacity packs for Class 1, 2, and 3 forklifts. We anticipate research and development expenses continuing to be a significant portion of our expenses as we continue to develop and add new and improved products to our product line-up.

 

 

Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities

 

The derivative liability was eliminated as of January 23, 2017, resulting in a Fiscal 2018 decrease of $14,000, or 100%, compared to Fiscal 2017 (see Note 7 to the audited consolidated financial statements).

 

Interest Expense

 

Interest expense for Fiscal 2018 increased $479,000, or 175%, compared to Fiscal 2017 and was primarily comprised of interest on our outstanding lines of credit. On December 29, 2015, we entered into the Second Amendment of our Unrestricted Line of Credit (see Note 6 to the audited consolidated financial statements), which included, among other provisions, the reduction in the conversion price of the Unrestricted Line of Credit from $3.00 to $0.60 per share. The estimated change in fair value of the conversion price of approximately $310,000 was recorded as a deferred financing cost at the date of the Second Amendment and was amortized over the then remaining seven-month term of the amended Unrestricted Line of Credit agreement. During Fiscal 2017, we recorded approximately $44,000 of deferred financing amortization cost, which is included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Also included in Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017 was interest expense of approximately $752,000 and $228,000, respectively, related to our outstanding lines of credit and deferred discount amortization (see Notes 6 and 7 to the audited consolidated financial statements).

 

Net Loss

Net loss during Fiscal 2018 increased $2,530,000, or 57%, compared to Fiscal 2017. The increase is due primarily to increased selling, administrative, and research and development expenses, as discussed above.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Overview

 

As of March 31, 2019, and June 30, 2018, we had a cash balance of $900,000 and $2,706,000, respectively. Since June, 2012, when we changed our business operations to the design, development and sale of rechargeable advanced energy storage systems, we have generated negative cash flows from operations, and we have financed our operations primarily through sales of our products, private sales of equity securities and credit facilities. 

 

In January 2019, we completed the sale of 3,992,564 shares of common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of $4,391,820, or $1.10 per share in cash, before expenses. A portion of the proceeds from the offering was used to repay in full approximately $2.6 million in borrowings and accrued interest under two short-term credit facilities with two creditors.

 

In March 2019, we amended our Original Credit Facility with Esenjay to (i) increase the line of credit from $5,000,000 to $7,000,000 to purchase inventory and related operational support expenses, (ii) added Cleveland as an additional lender, and (iii) extend the maturity date from March 31, 2019 to December 31, 2019. As of March 31, 2019, we have an outstanding balance of $3,405,000 and a remaining credit line of $3,595,000 for future draws.

 

We have evaluated our expected cash requirements over the next twelve months, which include, but are not limited to, investments in additional sales and marketing and product development resources, capital expenditures, and working capital requirements and have determined that our existing cash resources are not sufficient to meet our anticipated needs during the next twelve months, and that additional financing is required to support our operations. Based on our existing and planned levels of expenditures, we estimate that our available cash balance, credit facilities, and the expected net proceeds of this offering will be sufficient to fund our existing and planned operations for the next twelve months from the date of this prospectus. We will need to raise additional capital after this offering to fund our business plan subsequent to that date, until such time as revenues and related cash flows become sufficient to support our operating costs.

 

We intend to continue to seek capital through the sale of equity securities through private or public placements and debt placements.

 

 

The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods indicated:

 

	Nine Months Ended March 31,		Year Ended June 30,
	2019	2018	2018	2017
Net cash used in operating activities	(7,055,000)	(4,679,000)	(6,500,000)	(5,698,000)
Net cash used in investing activities	(144,000)	(59,000)	(85,000)	(53,000)
Net cash provided by financing activities	5,393,000	4,745,000	9,170,000	5,745,000
Net change in cash	(1,806,000)	7,000	2,585,000	(6,000)

 

Operating Activities

 

Net cash used in operating activities was $7,055,000 during the nine months ended March 31, 2019, compared to net cash used in operations of $4,679,000 during the nine months ended March 31, 2018. The primary reason for the increase in net cash used in operations was a significant increase in net loss and an increase in inventory and accounts receivable at March 31, 2019, offset by increases in accounts payable, and accrued expenses and interest. Inventory and accounts receivables levels increased to support significant increase in revenue.

 

Net cash used in operating activities was $6,500,000 for the year ended June 30, 2018, compared to net cash used in operations of $5,698,000 for the year ended June 30, 2017. Cash used in operating activities for year ended June 30, 2018 reflects the net loss of $6,965,000 offset primarily by non-cash items including depreciation, stock-based compensation, stock issued for services and the amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount, as well as the purchase of inventory and the payment of accounts payable and accrued interest. Cash used in operating activities for year ended June 30, 2017 reflects the net loss of $4,435,000 offset primarily by non-cash items including depreciation, stock-based compensation, stock issued for services, as well as an increase in accounts receivable and accrued interest.

 

Investing Activities

 

Net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended March 31, 2019 resulted from the purchase of office equipment, primarily computer related, for $144,000. Net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended March 31, 2018 consisted primarily of the purchase of office and warehouse equipment and leasehold improvements, totaling $59,000.

 

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 totaled $85,000 and $53,000, respectively, which consisted primarily of office and warehouse equipment purchases.

  

Financing Activities

 

Net cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended March 31, 2019 was $5,393,000 and consisted primarily of proceeds from the sale of common stock. Net cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended March 31, 2018 was $4,745,000 and resulted primarily from borrowing under our line of credit with Esenjay.

 

Net cash provided by financing activities during the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $9,170,000 and $5,745,000, respectively. The increase in cash provided by financing activities primarily resulted from the borrowings under our lines of credit with Esenjay totaling $5,195,000, as well as proceeds from a $4,000,000 private placement of common stock.

 

 

Indebtedness

 

On March 31, 2019, we amended our line of credit with Esenjay, a related party, to: (i) increase the maximum principal amount available under line of credit from $5,000,000 to $7,000,000 (LOC), (ii) add Cleveland, our minority stockholder, as an additional lender to the LOC pursuant to which each lender has a right to advance a pro rata amount of the principal amount available under the LOC, (iii) extend the maturity date from March 31, 2019 to December 31, 2019, and (iv) to provide for additional parties to become a lender under the LOC. $3,405,000 remains outstanding under the LOC as of March 31, 2019, and $3,595,000 is available for future draws. The LOC matures on December 31, 2019.

 

Going Concern

 

For the nine months ended March 31, 2019 and the year ended June 31, 2018, we incurred net losses from operations of $9,139,000 and $6,965,000, respectively. As of March 31, 2019, we had an accumulated deficit of $35,801,000. In addition, as of March 31, 2019, our available cash balance was $900,000. In their report on the annual consolidated financial statements for Fiscal 2018, our independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph in which they expressed substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise additional capital on a timely basis until such time as revenues and related cash flows are sufficient to fund our operations. Management’s plans are to continue to seek funding, as necessary, through the sale of equity securities, credit line extensions and convertible debt placements.  

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements or any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, including entities sometimes referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, that were established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. 

  

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The amendments in this ASU change the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets and making targeted changes to lessor accounting. The guidance is effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning July 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The new leases standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. We have not completed our assessment of the potential impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

 

 

BUSINESS

 

Overview

 

We design, develop and sell advanced rechargeable lithium-ion energy storage solutions for lift trucks, airport ground support equipment (GSE) and other industrial motive applications. With a decade of experience in lithium-ion technology, we believe our “LiFT” battery packs, including our proprietary battery management system (BMS), provide our customers with a better performing, cheaper and more environmentally friendly alternative, in many instances, to traditional lead-acid and propane-based solutions. We have prioritized achieving Underwriters Laboratory (UL) Listing for our Lift pack products. We believe that a UL Listing demonstrates the safety, reliability and durability of our products and gives us an important competitive advantage over other lithium-ion energy suppliers. Our LiFT packs have been approved for use by leading industrial motive manufacturers, including Toyota Material Handling USA, Inc., Crown Equipment Corporation, and Raymond Corporation.

 

Within our industrial market segments, we believe that our LiFT pack solutions provide cost and performance benefits over existing lead-acid power products including:

 

 

Additionally, the toxic nature of lead-acid batteries presents significant safety and environmental issues as they are subject to Environmental Protection Agency lead-acid battery reporting requirements, may create an environmental hazard in the event of a cell breach, and emit combustible gases during charging.

 

As a result of the advantages lithium-ion battery technology provide over lead-acid batteries, we have experienced significant growth in our business. We believe we are at the very early stage of a trend toward the adoption of lithium-ion technology and the displacement of lead-acid and propane-based energy storage solutions, which based on North American sales data from the Industrial Truck Association (ITA), we estimate to be a multi-billion dollar per year market.

 

We launched our LiFT packs for the Class 3 Walkie Pallet Jack (Class 3 Walkie) product line in 2014 and

received Underwriters Laboratory (UL) Listing on our Class 3 Walkie LiFT pack product line in 2016. We expect to seek UL Listing during calendar 2019 for our other product lines, which include Class 1 Counterbalance/Sit down/Ride-on (Class 1 Ride-on) LiFT packs , Class 2 Narrow Aisle LiFT packs, and Class 3 End Rider LiFT packs.

 

Critical to our success is our innovative and proprietary high power BMS that both optimizes the performance of our LiFT packs and provides a platform for adding new battery pack features, including customized telemetry for customers. The BMS serves as the brain of the battery pack, managing cell balancing, charging, discharging, monitoring and communication between the pack and the forklift.

 

Our engineers design, develop, service, and test our products. We source our battery cells from multiple suppliers in China and the remainder of the components primarily from vendors in the United States. Final assembly, testing and shipping of our products is done from our ISO 9001 certified facility in Vista, California, which includes three assembly lines.

 

Our Strengths

 

We have leveraged our decade of experience in lithium-ion technology to design and develop a suite of LiFT pack products lines that we believe provide attractive solutions to customers seeking an alternative to lead-acid and propane-based power products. We believe that the following attributes are significant contributors to our success:

 

Engineering and integration experience in lithium-ion for motive applications: We have been developing lithium-ion applications for the advanced energy storage market since 2010, starting with products for automotive electric vehicle manufacturers. We believe our expertise in management of large format lithium cells and overall experience in control and integration of battery modules has enabled us to develop superior.

 

 

UL Listing: We launched our LiFT packs for the Class 3 Walkie product line in 2014 and obtained our UL Listing for all three different power configurations in January 2016. We believe this UL Listing gives us a significant competitive advantage and provides assurance to customers that our technology has been rigorously tested by an independent third party and determined to be safe, durable and reliable. We believe that the process involved in obtaining UL Listing has enabled us to substantially enhance our entire family of products, including in the areas of overall design and durability, which we believe has improved the performance and overall value of our LiFT packs. We are seeking to obtain additional UL Listings for our other LiFT pack product lines during calendar 2019.

 

Original equipment manufacturer (OEM) approvals: Our Class 3 Walkie LiFT packs have been tested and approved for use by Toyota Material Handling USA, Inc., Crown Equipment Corporation, and Raymond Corporation, among the top global lift truck manufacturers by revenue according to Material Handling & Logistics. We also provide a “private label” LiFT pack for a Class 3 Walkie LiFT pack to a major forklift OEM.

 

Broad product offering and scalable design: We offer LiFT packs for use in a variety of industrial motive applications. We believe that our modular and scalable design enables us to optimize design, inventory, and part count to accommodate natural product extensions of our products to meet customer requirements. Based on our Class 3 Walkie LiFT pack design, we have expanded our produce lines to include Class 1 Ride-on, Class 2 Narrow Aisle, and Class 3 End Rider LiFT pack product lines as well as airport GSE packs. Our modular design enables us to group cells in certain unit counts and electrical connections (series vs. parallel) that can be easily modified to satisfy a wide range of power requirements for varying voltages, current amperages, and kilowatt power ratings. The modular design also includes three (3) different physical formats to accommodate a variety of dimension requirements.

 

Significant advantages over lead acid and propane solutions: We believe that lithium-ion battery systems have significant advantages over existing technologies and will displace lead-acid batteries and propane-based solutions, in most applications, because they have a number of advantages over these legacy technologies. Relative to lead-acid batteries, such advantages include environmental benefits, no water maintenance, faster charge times, greater cycle life and longer run times that provide operational and financial benefits to customers. Compared to propane solutions, lithium-ion systems avoid the generation of exhaust emissions and associated odor and environmental contaminates, and maintenance of an internal combustion engine, which has substantially more parts than an electric motor.

 

Proprietary Battery Management System: We have developed a high power BMS that is incorporated into our entire product family. The BMS serves as the brain of the battery pack, managing cell balancing, charging, discharging, monitoring and communication between the battery pack and the forklift. Our BMS is specifically designed for the industrial motive application environment and is adaptable to meet custom requirements. The system is optimized to meet the operational requirements of material handling and airport ground support equipment and to work with the LiFePO4 battery chemistry (although we can easily accommodate other lithium-ion chemistries). We have designed our BMS to interface with telematics systems to enable remote diagnostics, software upgrades and early warnings to fleet managers. Our next generation BMS design will be released in fiscal year 2019 and incorporate advanced automotive chip technologies that will enable faster, lower cost, more extensive data logging and easier re-configurations for product extensions.

 

Our Products

 

We have developed, tested, and sold our LiFT packs for use in a broad range of lift trucks, as pictured below, including Class 3 Walkie and End Riders, Class 2 Narrow Aisle, and Class 1 Ride-on, as well as for airport GSE. Within each of these product segments, there is a range of power and equipment variations. Our LiFT packs fit most of these variations, with only minor modifications needed to fit the remaining low volume applications. This equipment is described in more detail below.

 

 

  

Class 3 Walkie Pallet Jack Packs

 

Class 1 Counterbalance/Sit Down/Ride-on

 

 

 

  

Because we are addressing a wide range of power and energy requirements across broad industrial motive applications, we have taken a modular approach to our battery pack system design. We have three core design modules that are used in our entire family of forklift products. Our core modules are designed for small, medium, and large packs. The design of each core module is driven by power and physical space sizing. The core module for our small LiFT pack, which fits a Class 3 Walkie, is a 24-volt lithium pack (figure below) comprised of individual 3.2-volt cells. The medium and large cored modules are designed to accommodate larger equipment size and power by adding more cells and components. These larger designs support 36-volt, 48-volt, and 72-volt applications with power requirements up to 900Ah (amps per hour or “current” rating), which enables us to offer a full product line-up ..

 

  

We offer varying chemistries and configurations based on the specific application. Currently, our LiFT packs use lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) battery cells, which we source from a variety of overseas suppliers that meet our power, reliability, safety and other specifications. Because our BMS is not designed to work with aspecific battery chemistry, and we do not develop or manufacture our own battery cells, we believe we can readily adapt our LiFT packs as new chemistries become available in the market or customer preferences change.

 

  

We also offer 24-volt onboard chargers for our Class 3 Walkie LiFT packs, and smart “wall mounted” chargers for larger applications. Our smart charging solutions are designed to interface with our BMS.

 

Industry Overview

 

The motive energy storage markets have evolved from reliance primarily on lead-acid technologies created in the 1800s to increasing use of advanced chemistries that have the ability to store energy more efficiently and with lower environmental impact.

 

Driven by overall growth in global demand for lithium-ion battery solutions, the supply of lithium-ion batteries has rapidly expanded, leading to price declines of eighty-five percent (85%) since 2010 according to BloombergNEF. BloombergNEF also estimates that lithium-ion battery pack prices, which averaged $1,160 per kilowatt hour in 2010, were $176 per kWh in 2018 and could drop below $100 in 2024.

 

  

The sharp decline in the price of lithium-ion batteries has commenced a shift in customer preferences away from lead-acid and propane-based solutions for power lift equipment to lithium-ion based solutions. We believe our position as a pioneer in the field and our extensive experience providing lithium-ion based storage solutions makes us uniquely positioned to take advantage of this shift in customer preferences.

 

Lift Equipment - Material Handling Equipment

 

We focus on energy storage solutions for lift equipment and GSE because we believe they represent large and growing markets that are just beginning to adopt lithium-ion based technology. These markets include not only the sale of lithium-ion battery solutions for new equipment but also a replacement market for existing lead acid battery packs.

 

Historically, larger lift trucks were powered by internal combustion engines, using propane as a fuel, with smaller equipment powered by lead-acid batteries. Over the past thirty years, there has been a significant shift toward electric power. According to Liftech/ITA, over this time period the percentage of lift trucks powered electrically has doubled from approximately 30% to over sixty percent 60%. 

 

According to McKinsey & Co., worldwide new lift truck orders reached approximately 1.4 million units in 2017 and had been over 1.2 million units per year for the prior five years. The Industrial Truck Association has estimated that approximately 200,000 lift trucks had been sold yearly since 2013 in North America (Canada, the United States and Mexico), including approximately 253,000 units sold in 2017, with sales relatively evenly distributed between electric rider Class 1 and Class 2, motorized hand (Class 3), and internal combustion engine powered lift trucks (Class 4 and Class 5). The ITA estimates that electric lift trucks represented approximately 64% of the North American market in 2017. Driven by growth in global manufacturing, e-commerce and construction, Research and Markets expects that the global lift truck market will grow at a compound annual growth rate of 6.4% through 2024.

 

 

Customers

 

Some of our end users of our LiFT packs include companies in a number of different industries, as shown in the graphic below:

 

  

During the three months ended March 31, 2019, we had two major customers (Crown Equipment Corporation and Toyota Material Handling USA, Inc.) that each represented more than 10% of our revenues on an individual basis, and approximately 59% in the aggregate. During the nine months ended March 31, 2019, we had four major customers (including two additional customers, Caterpillar Inc. and Delta Airlines that each represented more than 10% of our revenues on an individual basis, or approximately 80% in the aggregate.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, we had two major customers (Crown Equipment Corporation and Toyota Material Handling USA, Inc.) that each represented more than 10% of our revenues on an individual basis, or approximately 92% in the aggregate. During the nine months ended March 31, 2018, we had two major customers (Crown Equipment Corporation and Toyota Material Handling USA, Inc.) that each represented more than 10% of our revenues on an individual basis, or approximately 85% in the aggregate.

 

Shift Toward Lithium-ion Battery Technologies

 

We expect that there will be a significant increase in demand for safe and efficient alternatives to lead-acid and propane-based power products. There are a number of factors driving the change in customer preference away from these legacy products and toward lithium-ion energy storage solutions:

 

Duration of Charge/Run Times: Lithium-based energy storage systems can perform for a longer duration compared to lead-acid batteries. Lithium-ion batteries provide up to 50% longer run times than lead-acid batteries of comparable capacity, or amps-per-hour rating, allowing equipment to be operated over a long period of time between charges.

 

High/Sustained Power: Lithium-ion batteries are better suited to deliver high power versus legacy lead-acid. For example, a 100Ah lead acid battery will only deliver 80Ah if discharged over a four-hour period. In contrast, a 100Ah lithium-ion system will achieve over 92Ah even during a 30 minute discharge. Additionally, during discharge, the LiFT pack sustains its initial voltage, maximizing the performance of the forklift truck, whereas, lead acid voltages, and hence power, decline over the working shift.

 

 

 

Charging Time: Lead acid batteries are limited to one shift a day, as they discharge for eight hours, need eight hours for charging, and another eight hours for cooling. For multi-shift operations, this typically requires battery changeout for the equipment. Because lithium batteries can be recharged in as little as one hour and do not degrade when subjected to opportunity charging, hence, battery changeout is unnecessary.

 

Safe Operation: The toxic nature of lead-acid batteries presents significant safety and environmental issues in the event of a cell breach. During charging, lead acid emits combustible gases and increases in temperature. Lithium-ion (particularly LFP) batteries do not get as hot and avoid many of the safety and environmental issues associated with lead-acid batteries.

 

Extended Life: The performance of lead-acid batteries degrades after approximately 500 charging cycles in industrial equipment applications. In comparison, lithium-ion batteries last up to five times longer in the same application.

 

Size and Weight: Lithium is about one-third the weight of lead acid for comparable power ratings.

 

Lower Cost: Lithium-ion batteries provide power dense solutions with extended cycle life, reduced maintenance and improved operational performance, resulting in lower total cost of ownership.

 

Marketing and Sales

 

In the industrial motive market, OEMs sell their lift products through dealer networks and directly to end customers. Because of environmental issues associated with lead-acid batteries and to preserve customer choice, industrial lift products are typically sold without a battery pack. Equipment dealers source battery packs from battery distributors and battery pack suppliers based on demand or in response to customer specifications. End customers may specify a specific type and manufacturer of battery pack to the equipment dealer or may purchase battery packs from battery distributors or directly from battery suppliers. Consequently, we sell our products through a number of different channels, including directly to end users, OEMs and lift equipment dealers or through battery distributors.

 

Our four-person direct sales staff is assigned to major geographies nation-wide to collaborate with our sales partners who have an established customer base. We are seeking to hire additional sales staff to support our expected sales growth. In addition, we have developed a nation-wide sales network of relationships with equipment OEMs, their dealers, and battery distributors.

 

We have worked directly with a number of OEMs to secure “technical approval” for compatibility of our LiFT packs with their equipment. Once we receive that approval, we focus on developing a sales network utilizing existing battery distributors and equipment dealers, along with the OEM corporate national account sales force, to drive sales through this channel.

 

As our LiFT packs have gained acceptance in the marketplace, we have seen an increase in direct-to-end-customer sales, ranging from small enterprises to Fortune 500 companies. To expand our customer reach, we have begun to market directly to end users, primarily focusing on large fleets operated by Fortune 500 companies seeking productivity improvements. We have seen initial success in these efforts, including sales to a Fortune 100 heavy machinery conglomerate. Our marketing efforts to these customers focus on the benefits of lithium-ion batteries over lead acid batteries in their equipment.

 

Our product development efforts have included pilot programs and trials with national account end users. This has resulted in increased sales to these end users as many of them seek to replace lead-acid batteries with lithium power packs in their fleets as they buy new equipment.

 

To support our products, we have a nation-wide network of service providers, typically forklift equipment dealers and battery distributors, who provide local support to large customers. We utilize a discount price to our standard retail prices to compensate our partners for customer orders and service availability. We also maintain a call center and provide Tech Bulletins and training to our service and sales network out of our corporate headquarters.

 

 

Our warranty policy for our family of forklift products includes a limited five-year warranty. Warranty claims are handled by our call center that determines the appropriate response path: return pack, field fix by approved technician on location, or technical resolution by the call center. Our approved field technicians are typically equipment dealers or battery distributors, charging agreed upon discounted rates to their “street rates.”

 

We partner with Averest, Inc., an experienced GSE distributor, to market our lithium-ion battery packs for airport GSE. Our sales cycle for GSE equipment has required initial multi-month evaluation periods of packs prior to ordering. After initial shipments, subsequent ordering is dependent upon operating requirements and capital budgeting.

 

We customarily maintain a relatively small inventory of Class 3 Walkie LiFT packs, which typically have shorter customer timing requirements than other lift equipment. For larger packs, we seek to align our inventory and production with historical OEM order patterns. Typically, we deliver larger packs on a four- to eight-week lead time. Because of associated lead times, we provide six-month rolling forecasts to our battery sell suppliers who manufacture and deliver to our forecast.

 

Ordering patterns primarily reflect ordering patterns of new equipment, commonly done in monthly or quarterly stages by large customers, as single fleet-size orders would require significant planning and operational support to implement. Backlog varies with customers but is driven by operating timing. Customer payment terms are normally net 30 days, but certain large customers require extended payment terms, ranging from 45 to 60 days. We have experienced some seasonality, particularly in July, August and December.

     

Manufacturing and Assembly

 

We source our battery cells from multiple suppliers in China and the remainder of the components primarily from vendors in the United States. While we have experienced supply interruptions from time to time, none have been material. Production rates aligned with our forecasts have helped us mitigate the risk of disruption. Our BMS is not dependent on a specific lithium-ion chemistry or cell manufacturer, as we are agnostic to chemistry and supplier. We monitor and test potential new cell technologies on an ongoing basis. Final assembly, testing and shipping of our products is done from our ISO 9001 certified facility in Vista, California, which includes three assembly lines.

 

We design our BMS modules/boards and have two granted patents: (i) a 12-volt battery design; and (ii) a battery display design. Component acquisition and assembly of the BMS modules/boards are outsourced to two local, Southern California board houses, both of whom meet our quality and other specifications.

 

We buy chargers from several sources, including a U.S. based supplier. Additionally, we are a qualified dealer for a well-known manufacturer of “high capacity, modular, smart chargers” which support our larger packs.

 

Research and Development

 

Our engineers design, develop, service, and test our products. We believe our core competencies and capabilities are designing and developing technology for BMS, systems engineering, engineering application, and software engineering for both battery packs and telemetry. We believe that our ability to develop new features and technology for our BMS is essential to our growth strategy.

 

Research and development expenses for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were approximately $1,956,000 and $1,052,000, respectively. Such expenses consisted primarily of materials, supplies, salaries and personnel related expenses, stock-based compensation expense, consulting costs and other expenses. Research and development expenses in fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 (Fiscal 2018) were higher than fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 (Fiscal 2017) primarily due to the development and implementation of the higher capacity packs for Class 1, 2, and 3 forklifts.

 

Research and development expenses for the nine (9) months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 were approximately $2,892,000 and $1,441,000, respectively. Such expenses consisted primarily of materials, supplies, salaries and personnel related expenses, stock-based compensation expense, consulting costs and other expenses. Research and development expenses in the nine (9) months ended March 31, 2019 were one hundred two percent (102%) higher than the nine (9) months ended March 31, 2018 primarily due to our continued focus in developing lithium-ion battery packs for our family of LiFT packs products and GSE.

 

 

As we continue to develop our product offerings, we anticipate that research and development expenses will continue to be a substantial part of our focus. We perform our research and development at our facility in Vista, California. We seek to develop innovative new and improved products for cell and system management along with associated communication, display, current sensing and charging tools.

 

Competition

 

Our competitors in the lift equipment market are primarily major lead-acid battery manufacturers, including Exide Technologies, East Penn Manufacturing Company, EnerSys Corporation, and Crown Batter Corporation We do not believe that these suppliers offer lithium-based products for lift equipment in any significant volume to end users, equipment dealers, OEMs or battery distributors. Several OEMs offer lithium-ion battery packs on Class 3 forklifts for sale only with their own new forklifts. As the demand for lithium-ion battery packs has increased, a number of lithium battery pack providers have entered the market, most of whom we believe are suppliers of existing power products who have added a lithium product to their product lines.

 

The key competitive factors in this market are performance, reliability, durability, safety and price. We believe we compete effectively based on our experience with lithium-ion technology, including our development capabilities and the performance of our proprietary BMS. We believe that the UL Listing covering our entire Class 3 Walkie LiFT pack product line is a significant differentiating competitive advantage and we intend to extend that advantage by seeking to obtain UL Listings for our other LiFT pack products during calendar 2019. In addition, because our BMS is not reliant on any specific battery cell chemistry, we believe we can adapt rapidly to changes in advanced battery technology or customer preferences. 

 

Intellectual Property

 

Our success depends, at least in part, on our ability to protect our core technology and intellectual property. To accomplish this, we rely on a combination of patents pending, patent applications, trade secrets, including know-how, employee and third party nondisclosure agreements, copyright laws, trademarks, intellectual property licenses and other contractual rights to establish and protect our proprietary rights in our technology. In addition to such factors as innovation, technological expertise and experienced personnel, we believe that a strong patent position is important to remain competitive.

 

As of March 31, 2019, we have two issued patents and three trademark registrations protecting the Flux Power name and logo. We intend to file additional patent applications with respect to our technology, including our next generation BMS 2.0, which we plan to release for production later this year. We also intend to seek protection of our intellectual property internationally in a broad range of areas. We do not know whether any of our efforts will result in the issuance of patents or whether the examination process will require us to narrow our claims. Even if granted, there can be no assurance that these pending patent applications will provide us with protection. We have two granted patents: (i) a 12-volt battery design and (ii) a battery display design. Based on soon to be released next generation BMS, we plan to file four utility patents within this year.

 

Government Regulations

 

Product Safety Regulations. Our products are subject to product safety regulations by Federal, state, and local organizations. Accordingly, we may be required, or may voluntarily determine to obtain approval of our products from one or more of the organizations engaged in regulating product safety. These approvals could require significant time and resources from our technical staff and, if redesign were necessary, could result in a delay in the introduction of our products in various markets and applications.

 

Environmental Regulations. Federal, state, and local regulations impose significant environmental requirements on the manufacture, storage, transportation, and disposal of various components of advanced energy storage systems. Although we believe that our operations are in material compliance with current applicable environmental regulations, there can be no assurance that changes in such laws and regulations will not impose costly compliance requirements on us or otherwise subject us to future liabilities.

 

 

Moreover, Federal, state, and local governments may enact additional regulations relating to the manufacture, storage, transportation, and disposal of components of advanced energy storage systems. Compliance with such additional regulations could require us to devote significant time and resources and could adversely affect demand for our products. There can be no assurance that additional or modified regulations relating to the manufacture, storage, transportation, and disposal of components of advanced energy systems will not be imposed.

 

Occupational Safety and Health Regulations. The California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) and other regulatory agencies have jurisdiction over the operations of our Vista, California facility. Because of the risks generally associated with the assembly of advanced energy storage systems we expect rigorous enforcement of applicable health and safety regulations. Frequent audits by, or changes in, the regulations issued by Cal/OSHA, or other regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over our operations, may cause unforeseen delays and require significant time and resources from our technical staff.

 

Employees

 

As of April 30, 2019, we had 75 full-time employees. We engage outside consultants for business development and operations or other functions from time to time. None of our employees is currently represented by a trade union.

  

Properties

 

Our headquarters are located at 985 Poinsettia Avenue, Suite A, Vista, California, where we lease 22,054 square feet. Final assembly, testing and shipping of our products is done at this facility which is ISO 9001 certified and includes three assembly lines. Effective February 25, 2014, we entered into a two (2)-year lease agreement for this facility with average monthly rent payments of approximately $12,000 per month and paid a security deposit of $25,000, or approximately two months of rent. The lease was subsequently extended to May 31, 2019, with an average rent expense of approximately $15,000 per month.

 

We are relocating our headquarters and production facility to 2685 South Melrose Drive, Vista, California, where we are leasing approximately 45,600 square feet with an option for an additional 15,300 square-feet of warehouse space, which we believe is sufficient for our projected future growth. Monthly rent for the new space is $42,300 and escalates 3% per year through the end of the lease term in January 2024. We expect to relocate to the new facility on June 25, 2019, with an option to extend the lease for our existing space to mid-July, 2019 if operating needs require. We intend to seek ISO 9001 certification for the new facility.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. We are not a party to any material legal proceedings.

  

 

MANAGEMENT

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Significant Employees

 

Identification of Directors, Executive Officers and Significant Employees

 

The following table and text set forth the names and ages of our current directors, executive officers and significant employees as of April 30, 2019. Our Board of Directors is comprised of only one class. All of the directors will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, retirement, resignation or removal. There are no family relationships among any of the directors and executive officers. Our Board of Directors are not paid for their service.

 

Name		Age		Position
Christopher L. Anthony		43		Chairman
Ronald F. Dutt		72		Director, Chief Executive Officer and President
Charles A. Scheiwe		52		Chief Financial Officer and Secretary1
Jonathan A. Berry		51		Chief Operating Officer
Michael Johnson		70		Director
James Gevarges		55		Director

________________

 

There are no arrangements or understandings between our directors and executive officers and any other person pursuant to which any director or officer was or is to be selected as a director or officer.

 

Business Experience

 

Christopher L. Anthony, Chairman. Mr. Anthony was appointed as chairman on September 3, 2015 and has been a board member since June 14, 2012. Mr. Anthony was also the Company’s former chief executive officer from June 14, 2012 to June 28, 2013. Prior to the Company’s reverse acquisition of Flux Power Holdings, Inc., in June 2012, Mr. Anthony served as chairman and chief executive officer of Flux Power since it was incorporated in 2009. Mr. Anthony is the founder and a majority owner of Epic Boats, LLC (Epic Boats), a Delaware Corporation, and has served as an R&D advisor since it was founded in 2002 and also served as chief executive officer though October 2010. On June 28, 2013, Mr. Anthony resigned as Flux Power’s chief executive officer to return full time to his position as chief executive officer of Epic Boats to manage the day to day operations. Epic Boats is primarily engaged in the business of providing recreational and competitive watercrafts, including an electric wake boarding boat. From 2005 to 2009, Mr. Anthony served as the chief operating officer of Aptera Motors, Inc., a Delaware company engaged in the business of manufacturing a three-wheel electric car (Aptera Motors), and was a director of that company from 2005 to 2010. Aptera Motors and Epic Boats are not affiliates of the Company. Mr. Anthony is an expert in energy storage, electric propulsion systems, and advanced composite manufacturing processes. He has significant experience building advanced products in the marine and commuter vehicle industries. Mr. Anthony has a Bachelor of Science degree in finance from the Cameron School of Business.

 

Ronald F. Dutt. Director, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director. Mr. Dutt has been our chief executive officer, former interim chief financial officer and director since March 19, 2014. On September 19, 2017, he was also appointed as our president, chief financial officer and corporate secretary. He resigned as chief financial officer and corporate secretary as of December 16, 2018. Previously, he was our chief financial officer since December 7, 2012, and our interim chief executive officer since June 28, 2013. Mr. Dutt has served as the Company’s interim corporate secretary since June 28, 2013. Prior to Flux Power, Mr. Dutt provided chief financial officer and chief operating officer consulting services during 2008 through 2012. In this capacity Mr. Dutt provided financial consulting, including strategic business modeling and managed operations. Prior to 2008, Mr. Dutt served in several capacities as executive vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer for various public and private companies including SOLA International, Directed Electronics, Fritz Companies DHL Americas, Aptera Motors, Inc., and Visa International. Mr. Dutt holds an MBA in Finance from University of Washington and an undergraduate degree in Chemistry from the University of North Carolina. Additionally, Mr. Dutt served in the United States Navy and received an honorable discharge as a Lieutenant.

 

 

Charles A. Scheiwe, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. Mr. Scheiwe joined the Company in July of 2018 and has been acting as the Company’s Controller since July 9, 2018. He was appointed as our chief financial officer and secretary on December 17, 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Scheiwe was the controller of Senstay, Inc. and provided financial and accounting consulting services to start-up companies from 2016 to 2018. From 2006 to 2016, Mr. Scheiwe was the vice president of finance and controller for GreatCall, Inc. Mr. Scheiwe’s experience in accounting, financial planning and analysis, business intelligence, cash management, and equity management has prepared and qualified him for the position of chief financial officer and secretary of the Company. Mr. Scheiwe has a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Management, with emphasis in Accounting, from the University of Colorado. Mr. Scheiwe also holds a CPA certificate.

 

Jonathan A. Berry, Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Berry joined the Company in 2016 and has been our director of operations since 2016. On June 29, 2018, he was appointed as our chief operating officer. Prior to joining the Company in 2016, Mr. Berry was Clean Air Power, Inc.’s group operations director and general manager of the USA operations from 2014 to 2016, and operations director of the UK, Australia, and USA market from 2012 to 2014. Mr. Berry’s experience in the development, implementation, and management of all aspects of supply chain, production, and sales has prepared and qualified him for the position of chief operating officer. Mr. Berry has an MBA from Ashford Business School in London, England, and an undergraduate degree in electrical engineering from Leeds University.

 

Michael Johnson, Director. Mr. Johnson has been our director since July 12, 2012. Mr. Johnson has been a director of Flux Power since it was incorporated. Since 2002, Mr. Johnson has been a director and the chief executive officer of Esenjay Petroleum Corporation (Esenjay Petroleum), a Delaware company located in Corpus Christi, Texas, which is engaged in the business oil exploration and production. Mr. Johnson’s primary responsibility at Esenjay Petroleum is to manage the business and company as chief executive officer. Mr. Johnson is a director and beneficial owner of Esenjay Investments LLC, a Delaware company engaged in the business of investing in companies, and an affiliate of the Company owning approximately 61.4% of our outstanding shares, including common stock underlying options, warrants and convertible debt that were exercisable or convertible or which would become exercisable or convertible within 60 days. As a result of Mr. Johnson’s leadership and business experience, he is an industry expert in the natural gas exploration industry and brings a wealth of management and successful company building experience to the board. Mr. Johnson received a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Southwestern Louisiana.

 

James Gevarges, Director. Mr. Gevarges served on our Board as director from July 14, 2012 to October 24, 2014, at which time he resigned. On September 30, 2015, Mr. Gevarges was reinstated as a director. Mr. Gevarges is the president, chief executive officer, and a majority owner of Current Ways, Inc., a California company engaged in the business of manufacturing chargers and other components for electric vehicles, which he founded in 2010. Current Ways, Inc. is not an affiliate of the Company. Since 1991, Mr. Gevarges has also been a Director and the chief executive officer of LHV Power Corporation (formerly known as HiTek Power, Corp) (LHV Power), a California company located in Santee, California, which is engaged in the business of designing, manufacturing and marketing of power supply systems. Mr. Gevarges is the sole owner of LHV Power. LHV Power is not an affiliate of the Company. Mr. Gevarges’ primary responsibilities at LHV Power are to manage the company and business as chief executive officer and president. As a result of Mr. Gevarges’ management and industry experience, he is a power supply industry expert and brings an enormous amount of manufacturing and successful company management experience to the Company. Mr. Gevarges has a Bachelor of Science degree in electrical engineering from Louisiana State University.

 

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

 

To the best of our knowledge, during the past ten years, none of our directors or executive officers were involved in any of the following: (1) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (2) any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (3) being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; and (4) being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.

 

 

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

 

The Board does not have a policy as to whether the roles of our chairman and chief executive officer should be separate. Instead, the Board makes this determination based on what best serves our Company’s needs at any given time.

 

In its governance role, and particularly in exercising its duty of care and diligence, the Board is responsible for ensuring that appropriate risk management policies and procedures are in place to protect the company’s assets and business. Our Board has broad and ultimate oversight responsibility for our risk management processes and programs and executive management is responsible for the day-to-day evaluation and management of risks to the Company.

 

Board Composition, Committees, and Independence

 

Under the rules of NASDAQ, “independent” directors must make up a majority of a listed company’s board of directors. In addition, applicable NASDAQ rules require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit and compensation committees be independent within the meaning of the applicable NASDAQ rules. Audit committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.

 

Our Board has undertaken a review of the independence of each director and considered whether any director has a material relationship with us that could compromise his ability to exercise independent judgment in carryout out his responsibilities. As a result of this review, our Board determined that we do not have independent board members. We plan on appointing “independent” directors prior to the completion of this offering so that a majority of our directors are independent, as required under applicable NASDAQ rules. As required under applicable NASDAQ rules, we anticipate that our independent directors will meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors are present.

 

Board Committees

 

We have no board committees, but we plan to institute, at minimum, an audit committee and compensation committee prior to the completion of the offering.

 

Code of Ethics

 

We have not adopted a Code of Ethics but expect to adopt a Code of Ethics and will require that each employee abide by the terms of such Code of Ethics. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will be posted on our website on or prior to the closing of this offering.

 

Indemnification Agreements

 

We executed a standard form of indemnification agreement (Indemnification Agreement) with each of our Board members and executive officers (each, an Indemnitee).

 

Pursuant to and subject to the terms, conditions and limitations set forth in the Indemnification Agreement, we agreed to indemnify each Indemnitee, against any and all expenses incurred in connection with the Indemnitee’s service as our officer, director and or agent, or is or was serving at our request as a director, officer, employee, agent or advisor of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, limited liability company, or other entity or enterprise but only if the Indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to our best interest, and in the case of a criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful. In addition, the indemnification provided in the indemnification agreement is applicable whether or not negligence or gross negligence of the Indemnitee is alleged or proven. Additionally, the Indemnification Agreement establishes processes and procedures for indemnification claims, advancement of expenses and costs and contribution obligations.

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 

Compensation for our Named Executive Officers

 

The following table sets forth information concerning all forms of compensation earned by our named executive officers during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 for services provided to the Company and its subsidiaries.

 

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)(1)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Ronald F. Dutt, Chief Executive Officer	2018	$170,000	$-	$-	$677,538	$-	$-	$847,538
Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Director and Corporate Secretary	2017	$170,000	$-	$-	$-	$-	$-	$170,000
Jonathan Berry, Chief Operating Officer(2)	2018	$145,000	$-	$-	$541,741	$-	$-	$686,741

 

 

 

Benefit Plans

 

We do not have any profit sharing plan or similar plans for the benefit of our officers, directors or employees. However, we may establish such plan in the future.

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

In connection with the reverse acquisition of Flux Power, Inc. in 2012, we assumed the 2010 Option Plan. As of June 30, 2018, the number of options outstanding to purchase common stock under the 2010 Option Plan was 379,000. No additional options to purchase common stock may be granted under the 2010 Option Plan.

 

On November 26, 2014, our board of directors approved our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (2014 Option Plan), which was approved by our stockholders on February 17, 2015. The 2014 Option Plan was amended by our board of directors on October 26, 2017 and approved by our stockholders on July 23, 2018. The 2014 Option Plan offers selected employees, directors, and consultants the opportunity to acquire our common stock, and serves to encourage such persons to remain employed by us and to attract new employees. The 2014 Option Plan allows for the award of stock and options, up to 10,000,000 shares of our common stock. We granted 438,000 incentive stock options under the 2014 Option Plan during Fiscal 2016, of which 320,000 remain outstanding at June 30, 2018. No options were granted during Fiscal 2017. We granted 2,118,000 incentive stock options and 807,000 non-qualified stock options under the 2014 Option Plan during Fiscal 2018.

 

As of June 30, 2018, we have 3,165,000 options and 379,000 options exercisable and outstanding which were granted from the 2014 Option Plan and 2010 Option Plan, respectively.

  

 

The following table sets forth certain information concerning unexercised options, stock that has not vested, and equity compensation plan awards outstanding as of June 30, 2018 for the named executive officers below:

 

	Option Awards(1)						Stock Awards
Name	Award Grant Date	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options	Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Ronald Dutt	6/29/2018	-	500,000	500,000	1.44	6/29/2028	-	$-	-	$-
	10/26/2017	187,500	312,500	312,500	0.46	10/26/2027	-	$-	-	$-
	12/22/2015	166,250	23,750	23,750	0.50	12/22/2025	-	$-	-	$-
	7/30/2013	175,000	-	-	1.0	7/29/2023	-	$-	-	$-
Jonathan Berry	6/29/2018	-	455,106	455,106	1.44	6/29/2028	-	$-	-	$-
	10/26/2017	84,375	140,625	140,625	0.46	10/26/2027	-	$-	-	$-

 

(1)

The fair value of each option grant is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatility is calculated based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The risk free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield for a term equal to the expected life of the options at the time of grant.

 

Compensation of Non-Executive Directors 

 

Aggregated Option/Stock Appreciation Right (SAR) exercised and Fiscal year-end Option/SAR value table

 

Neither our executive officers nor the other individuals listed in the tables above, exercised options or SARs during the last fiscal year.

 

Long-term incentive plans

 

No long term incentive awards were granted by us in the last fiscal year.

 

Employment Agreements with Executive Officers

 

We entered into an Employment Agreement with our chief executive officer, Ronald F. Dutt, effective December 11, 2012. Mr. Dutt is an “at-will” employee of Flux Power Holdings, Inc. The Employment Agreement provided for an annual salary of $170,000. On February 15, 2019, Flux Power Holdings, Inc. entered into an amendment to the Employment Agreement (Amendment) with the Company’s president and chief executive officer, Ronald F. Dutt, dated December 7, 2012. The Amendment confirmed Mr. Dutt’s continued services as the president and chief executive officer of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Flux Power, Inc., and setting Mr. Dutt’s new annual base salary to $195,000.

 

 

On December 17, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Charles A. Scheiwe to serve as our chief financial officer and secretary. In connection with his appointment as the Company’s chief financial officer and secretary, Mr. Scheiwe will receive an annual base salary of $145,000. Mr. Scheiwe is an “at-will” employee of Flux Power Holdings, Inc.

 

On June 29, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Jonathan Berry to serve as our chief operating officer. In connection with his appointment as the Company’s chief operating officer, Mr. Berry will receive an annual base salary of $145,000. Mr. Berry is an “at-will” employee of Flux Power Holdings, Inc.

 

There were no performance based bonuses paid for fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.

  

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN

BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

As used in this section, the term beneficial ownership with respect to a security is defined by Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as consisting of sole or shared voting power (including the power to vote or direct the vote) and/or sole or shared investment power (including the power to dispose of or direct the disposition of) with respect to the security through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise, subject to community property laws where applicable. As of April 30, 2019, we had a total of 51,000,868 shares of common stock issued outstanding.

 

The following table sets forth, as of April 30, 2019, information concerning the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock held by our directors, our named executive officers, our directors and executive officers as a group, and each person known by us to be a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, the business address of each of our directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock is c/o Flux Power Holdings, Inc., 985 Poinsettia Avenue, Suite A, Vista, California 92081. Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of our common stock, except as otherwise indicated. Beneficial ownership consists of a direct interest in the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated.

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)	Shares Beneficially Owned		% of Ownership
Officers and Directors
Michael Johnson, Director	31,378,973(2)		61.42%
Ronald Dutt, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director	1,213,574(3)		2.32%
Charles A Scheiwe, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary	93,750(4)		*
Jonathan A. Berry, Chief Operating Officer	461,928(5)		*
Christopher Anthony, Director	943,757(6)		1.85%
James Gevarges, Director	682,363(7)		1.34%
All Officers and Directors as a group (6 people)	3,477,345		65.60%
5% Stockholders
Cleveland Capital, L.P. 1250 Linda Street, Suite 304 Rocky River, OH 44116	5,159,100(8)		10.30%

 _______________________________________________

* Represents less than 1% of shares outstanding.

 

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

Credit Facility Agreement

 

On March 28, 2019, our subsidiary, Flux Power, entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Facility Agreement (LOC) with Esenjay Investments, LLC (Esenjay), and Cleveland Capital, L.P., our minority stockholder (Cleveland and Esenjay, together with additional parties that may join as a additional lenders, collectively the Lenders) to amend and restate the terms of the Credit Facility Agreement dated March 22, 2018 between Flux Power and Esenjay (the Original Credit Facility Agreement) in its entirety. Mr. Michael Johnson, a member of our board of directors and a major stockholder of our company, is the beneficial owner and director of Esenjay.

 

The Original Credit Facility Agreement was amended, among other things, to (i) increase the maximum principal amount available under line of credit from $5,000,000 to $7,000,000, (ii) add Cleveland as an additional lender to the LOC pursuant to which each lender has a right to advance a pro rata amount of the principal amount available under the LOC, (iii) extend the maturity date from March 31, 2019 to December 31, 2019, and (iv) to provide for additional parties to become a Lender under the LOC. In connection with the LOC, on March 28, 2019, we issued a secured promissory note to Cleveland (the Cleveland Note), and an amended and restated secured promissory note to Esenjay, which amended and superseded the secured promissory note dated March 22, 2018 (Esenjay Note and together with the Cleveland Note, the Notes). The Notes were issued for the aggregate principal amount of $7,000,000 or such lesser principal amount advanced by the respective Lender under the LOC. The Notes bear an interest of 15% per annum and a maturity date of December 31, 2019.

 

To secure the obligations under the Notes, Flux Power entered into an Amended and Restated Security Agreement dated March 28, 2019 with the Lenders (the Amended Security Agreement). The Amended Security Agreement amends and restates the Guaranty and Security Agreement dated March 22, 2018, by and between Flux Power and the Esenjay, by among other things, adding Cleveland as additional secured parties to the agreement and appointing Esenjay as collateral agent.

  

Loan Agreements With Esenjay

 

Between October 2011 and September 2012, we entered into three debt agreements with Esenjay. The three debt agreements consisted of a Bridge Loan Promissory Note (Bridge Note), a Secondary Revolving Promissory Note (Revolving Note) and an Unrestricted Line of Credit (Unrestricted LOC). On December 31, 2015, the Bridge Note and the Revolving Note expired, leaving the Unrestricted LOC available for future draws. The Unrestricted LOC had a maximum borrowing amount of $10,000,000, was convertible at a rate of $0.60 per share, bore interest at 8% per annum and was to mature on January 31, 2019. On October 31, 2018, we entered into an Early Note Conversion Agreement pursuant to which Esenjay converted the outstanding principal amount of $7,975,000 plus accrued and unpaid interest of $1,041,280 under the Bridge Note, Revolving Note and the Unrestricted LOC into 15,027,134 shares of our common stock. In connection with the Early Note Conversion Agreement, we issued an additional 268,018 shares of common stock to Esenjay and recorded the issuance as interest expense at the stock’s fair value of $466,351.

 

On March 22, 2018, Flux Power entered into the Original Credit Facility Agreement with Esenjay with a maximum borrowing amount of $5,000,000. Proceeds from the Original Credit Facility Agreement were to be used to purchase inventory and related operational expenses and accrued interest at a rate of 15% per annum. The outstanding balance of the Original Credit Facility and accrued interest was due and payable on March 31, 2019. Funds received from Esenjay since December 5, 2017 and prior to the Original Credit Facility Agreement were consolidated under the Original Credit Facility resulting in $2,405,000 outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and $2,595,000 available for future draws, subject to the lender’s approval. As disclosed above, the Original Credit Facility was amended on March 28, 2019 pursuant to the LOC.

 

Stockholder Short Term Lines of Credit

 

On October 26, 2018, we entered into a credit facility agreement with Cleveland, a related party, pursuant to which Cleveland agreed to make available to Flux a line of credit (Cleveland LOC) in a maximum principal amount at any time outstanding of up to 2,000,000 with a maturity date of December 31, 2018. The Cleveland LOC has an origination fee in the amount of $20,000, which represents 1% of the Cleveland LOC, and carries a simple interest of 12% per annum. Interest is calculated on the basis of the actual daily balances outstanding under the Cleveland LOC. The Cleveland LOC was paid back December 27, 2018.

 

 

Transactions with Epic Boats

 

We sublease office and manufacturing space to Epic Boats (an entity founded and controlled by Chris Anthony, our board member and former chief executive officer) in our facility in Vista, California, pursuant to a month-to-month sublease agreement. Pursuant to this agreement, Epic Boats pays Flux Power 10% of facility costs through the end of our lease agreement. We received $15,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2019 and $18,000 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, from Epic Boats under the sublease rental agreement. We plan to continue the sublease arrangement with Epic Boats at our new production facility.

 

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

 

The following description of our capital stock and provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation (Articles of Incorporation) and Amended and Restated Bylaws (Bylaws) are summaries, are not intended to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference such Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, copies of which have been filed as exhibits to our registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part.

 

Common Stock

 

We are authorized to issue up to 300,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. Each outstanding share of common stock entitles the holder thereof to one vote per share on all matters. As of May 10, 2019, there were 51,000,868 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

 

The holders of shares of our common stock are entitled to dividends out of funds legally available when and as declared by our Board of Directors. In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of our common stock are entitled to receive, ratably, the net assets available to stockholders after payment of all creditors.

 

To the extent that additional shares of our common stock are issued, the relative interests of existing stockholders will be diluted.

 

Voting Rights

 

Our common stock is entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders, including the election of directors, and does not have cumulative voting rights.

 

Economic Rights

 

Except as otherwise expressly provided in our Articles of Incorporation or required by applicable law, all shares of common stock will have the same rights and privileges and rank equally, share ratably, and be identical in all respects for all matters, including those described below.

 

Dividends

 

Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any then-outstanding preferred stock, the holders of common stock are entitled to receive dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by our Board of Directors out of legally available funds.

 

Liquidation Rights

 

In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, holders of our common stock will be entitled to share ratably in the net assets legally available for distribution to stockholders after the payment of all of our debts and other liabilities, subject to the satisfaction of any liquidation preference granted to the holders of any outstanding shares of preferred stock.

 

 

No Preemptive or Similar Rights

 

The holders of our shares of common stock are not entitled to preemptive rights, and are not subject to conversion, redemption or sinking fund provisions. The rights, preferences and privileges of the holders of our common stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of shares of any series of our preferred stock that we may designate and issue in the future.

 

Removal of Directors by Stockholders

 

Our Bylaws provide that subject to any limitations in our Articles of Incorporation, directors may be removed by a vote not less than two-thirds of the voting power of the issued and outstanding stock entitled to vote thereon, at a special meeting of the stockholders called for that purpose.

 

Preferred Stock

 

We may issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, in one or more classes or series within a class pursuant to our Articles of Incorporation. There are no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding. Preferred stock may be issued from time to time by the Board of Directors as shares of one or more classes or series. One of the effects of undesignated preferred stock may be to enable the Board of Directors to render more difficult or to discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a tender offer, proxy contest, merger or otherwise, and thereby to protect the continuity of our management. The issuance of shares of preferred stock pursuant to the Board of Directors’ authority described above may adversely affect the rights of holders of common stock. For example, preferred stock issued by us may rank prior to the common stock as to dividend rights, liquidation preference or both, may have full or limited voting rights and may be convertible into shares of common stock. Accordingly, the issuance of shares of preferred stock may discourage bids for the common stock at a premium or may otherwise adversely affect the market price of the common stock.

 

Nevada Laws

 

Sections 78.378 to 78.3793 of the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) (Acquisition of Controlling Interest) provide generally that any person or entity that acquires at least one-fifth of all the voting power in the election of directors of a Nevada corporation, which has 200 or more stockholders of record and does business in the State of Nevada, may be denied voting rights with respect to the acquired shares, unless a majority of the disinterested stockholders of the corporation elects to restore such voting rights in whole or in part.

 

Section 78.3785 of the NRS provides that a person or entity acquires “control shares” whenever it acquires shares that, but for the operation of the control share acquisition act, would bring its voting power within any of the following three ranges:

 

 

A “control share acquisition” is generally defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of either ownership or voting power associated with issued and outstanding control shares. The stockholders or board of directors of a corporation may elect to exempt the stock of the corporation from the provisions of the control share acquisition act through adoption of a provision to that effect in the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation.

 

Transfer Agent And Registrar

 

The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Issuer Direct Corporation, 1981 Murray Holladay Rd Suite 100, Salt Lake City, Utah 84117.

  

 

UNDERWRITING

 

We have entered into an underwriting agreement with Roth Capital Partners, LLC and Maxim Group LLC, acting as the representatives of the several underwriters named below, with respect to the shares of common stock subject to this offering. Subject to certain conditions, we have agreed to sell to the underwriters, and the underwriters have severally agreed to purchase, the number of shares of common stock provided below opposite their respective names.

 

Underwriters	Number of Shares
Roth Capital Partners, LLC
Maxim Group LLC
Total